Accurate Remaining Useful Life Prediction With Uncertainty Quantification: A Deep Learning and Nonstationary Gaussian Process Approach

被引:26
作者
Xu, Zhaoyi [1 ]
Guo, Yanjie [1 ]
Saleh, Joseph Homer [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Aerosp Sch, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Predictive models; Uncertainty; Feature extraction; Data models; Computational modeling; Training; Engines; Deep learning (DL); nonstationary Gaussian process regression (NSGPR); prognostic and health management (PHM); remaining useful life (RUL); DEGRADATION; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; SYSTEMS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1109/TR.2021.3124944
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Remaining useful life (RUL) refers to the expected remaining lifespan of a component or system. Accurate RUL prediction is critical for prognostic and health management and for maintenance planning. In this article, we address three prevalent challenges in data-driven RUL prediction, namely the handling of high-dimensional input features, the robustness to noise in sensor data and prognostic datasets, and the capturing of the time-dependency between system degradation and RUL prediction. We devise a highly accurate RUL prediction model with uncertainty quantification, which integrates and leverages the advantages of deep learning and nonstationary Gaussian process regression (DL-NSGPR). We examine and benchmark our model against other advanced data-driven RUL prediction models using the turbofan engine dataset from the NASA prognostic repository. Our computational experiments show that the DL-NSGPR predictions are highly accurate with root mean square error 1.7 to 6.2 times smaller than those of competing RUL models. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that RUL uncertainty bounds with the proposed DL-NSGPR are both valid and significantly tighter than other stochastic RUL prediction models. We unpack and discuss the reasons for this excellent performance of the DL-NSGPR.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 456
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Aggarwal K, 2018, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P1308, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622431
  • [2] Alshohoumi F, 2019, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V10, P232
  • [3] Baker K., 2005, Singular value decomposition tutorial, V24
  • [4] Chen Xiongzi, 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 10th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI 2011), P94, DOI 10.1109/ICEMI.2011.6037773
  • [5] Damianou A., 2013, ARTIF INTELL, V31, P207
  • [6] Dragomir O.E., 2009, CONTROL C ECC 2009 E, P1587
  • [7] Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture
    Ellefsen, Andre Listou
    Bjorlykhaug, Emil
    Aesoy, Vilmar
    Ushakov, Sergey
    Zhang, Houxiang
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 183 : 240 - 251
  • [8] A Sequential Bayesian Approach for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Dependent Competing Failure Processes
    Fan, Mengfei
    Zeng, Zhiguo
    Zio, Enrico
    Kang, Rui
    Chen, Ying
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2019, 68 (01) : 317 - 329
  • [9] Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks
    Fink, Olga
    Zio, Enrico
    Weidmann, Ulrich
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 121 : 198 - 206
  • [10] Goodfellow I, 2016, ADAPT COMPUT MACH LE, P1