Openwashing: A decoupling perspective on organizational transparency

被引:0
作者
Heimstaedt, Maximilian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Management, Boltzmannstr 20, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Reinhard Mohn Inst Management, Alfred Herrhausen Str 15, D-58455 Witten, Germany
关键词
Information sharing; Transparency; Secrecy; Decoupling; Open data; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; PARADOXES; LEGITIMACY; TYRANNY; SECRECY; TRUTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore2017.03.037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the rise of digital technologies, organizations are able to produce, process, and transfer large amounts of information at marginal cost. In recent years, these technological developments together with other macro phenomena like globalization and rising distrust of institutions has led to unprecedented public expectations regarding organizational transparency. In this study I explore the ways in which organizations resolve the tension between a growing norm to share internal information with the public and their inherent preferences for informational control. Through developing the notion of transparency decoupling, I examine how organizations respond strategically to transparency expectations. Drawing on studies of "open data" transparency initiatives in NYC, London, and Berlin, I inductively carve out three modes of institutional information decoupling: (a) selecting the disclosed information to exclude parts of the data or parts of the audience; (b) bending the information in order to retain some control over its representative value; (c) orchestrating new information for a particular audience. The article integrates literature from New Institutional Theory and Transparency Studies in order to contribute to our understanding of how information sharing is realized in the interaction between organizations and their environment. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:10
相关论文
共 88 条
[51]   Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model [J].
Hirsch, PM ;
Levin, DZ .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (02) :199-212
[52]  
Hirschman Albert O., 1970, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States
[53]  
Hood C., 2006, TRANSPARENCY KEY BET, P3, DOI DOI 10.5871/BACAD/9780197263839.001.0001
[54]   What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? [J].
Hood, Christopher .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 9 (02) :191-210
[55]   From open data to information justice [J].
Johnson, Jeffrey Alan .
ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 16 (04) :263-274
[56]  
Khanna T., 2010, WINNING EMERGING MAR, DOI DOI 10.1177/0974173920100316
[57]  
Kraatz M.S., 2008, The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, P840, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781849200387.N10
[58]  
Lord Kristin., 2007, The Perils and Promise of Global Transparency
[59]   Keeping up Appearances: Reputational Threat and Impression Management after Social Movement Boycotts [J].
McDonnell, Mary-Hunter ;
King, Brayden .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2013, 58 (03) :387-419
[60]   INSTITUTIONALIZED ORGANIZATIONS - FORMAL-STRUCTURE AS MYTH AND CEREMONY [J].
MEYER, JW ;
ROWAN, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1977, 83 (02) :340-363