Robot-Assisted Tubal Reanastomosis after Sterilization: A Choice for Family Planning

被引:2
作者
Salehjawich, Arwa [1 ]
Gunther, Veronika [1 ]
Ruchay, Zino [1 ]
Al Zoubi, Mazhar Salim [2 ]
Dhanawat, Juhi [1 ]
Maass, Nicolai [1 ]
Ackermann, Johannes [1 ]
Pape, Julian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Campus Kiel,Arnold Heller Str 3,House C, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Yarmouk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Basic Med Sci, Irbid 21163, Jordan
关键词
family planning; sterilization; robot-assisted; regret; tubal reanastomosis; MICROSURGICAL REVERSAL; RISK-FACTORS; ANASTOMOSIS; SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; REGRET; TECHNOLOGY; REQUEST; RATES; CLIP;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11154385
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A variety of procedures have been used for family planning. One of these is sterilization surgery, which can be reversed by a tubal reanastomosis. In the present report, we compare Robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis sterilization with other methods of family planning and discuss factors related to the choice of the approach. The keywords used for the electronic search in PubMed were family planning, sterilization, Robot-assisted, tubal reanastomosis, depression, and regret. The decision in favor of or against sterilization surgery has been a sensitive issue for several years. Robot-assisted technology is a modern and precise approach. It has contributed to the flexibility of the decision between sterilization and its reversal through tubal reanastomosis, as well as enhanced the success rate of the surgery. Based on our analysis of the published literature, we believe that Robot-assisted tubal anastomosis is the optimum approach. However, to ensure the quality of health care, the surgeon must be well trained, well versed with the anatomy of the fallopian tubes, and thoroughly informed on the psychological impact of family planning.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] An atraumatic retractor for interdisciplinary use in conventional laparoscopy and robotic surgery
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 27 (05) : 265 - 271
  • [2] Alkatout I, 2017, J GYNECOL SURG, V33, P81, DOI 10.1089/gyn.2016.0111
  • [3] Robotic surgery in gynecology
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    Mettler, Liselotte
    Maass, Nicolai
    Ackermann, Johannes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 17 (04) : 224 - 232
  • [4] Abdominal anatomy in the context of port placement and trocars
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    Mettler, Liselotte
    Maass, Nicolai
    Noe, Guenter-Karl
    Elessawy, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 16 (04) : 241 - 251
  • [5] Communicative and ethical aspects of physician-patient relationship in extreme situations
    Alkatout I.
    [J]. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, 2015, 165 (23-24) : 491 - 498
  • [6] Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARCs) methods
    Bahamondes, Luis
    Fernandes, Arlete
    Monteiro, Ilza
    Bahamondes, M. Valeria
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 66 : 28 - 40
  • [7] New Technology and Health Care Costs - The Case of Robot-Assisted Surgery
    Barbash, Gabriel I.
    Glied, Sherry A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (08) : 701 - 704
  • [8] Robotic Tubal Anastomosis: Technical Aspects
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    Barakat, Ehab M.
    Falcone, Tommaso
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2011, 15 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [9] Effectiveness of bilateral tubotubal anastomosis in a large outpatient population
    Berger, Gary S.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Weaver, Mark A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (05) : 1120 - 1125
  • [10] Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF?
    Boeckxstaens, An
    Devroey, Paul
    Collins, John
    Tournaye, Herman
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (10) : 2660 - 2664