Effectiveness of Pharmacological Pain Relief Methods on Birth Experience: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Ghanbari-Homaie, Solmaz [1 ,2 ]
Hasani, Sonia [2 ]
Pourfathi, Hojjat [3 ]
Mirghafourvand, Mojgan [4 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Midwifery, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, Tabriz, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Childbirth; epidural analgesia; entonox; meperidine; remifentanil; scopolamine hydrobromide; MATERNAL SATISFACTION; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; NITROUS-OXIDE; LABOR PAIN; CHILDBIRTH; ANESTHESIA; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2174/1573404817999201230234158
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The use of pharmacological pain relief methods during labour is increasing, however, there is no clear evidence that pharmacological interventions can also improve women's satisfaction with the birth experience. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions on women's satisfaction with birth experience (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the received method (secondary outcome). Methods: We searched databases in English (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, ProQuest, Scopus and Web of Science) and Persian languages (SID and Magiran) from inception until April 30, 2018, for clinical trials that pharmacological pain relief methods were compared with standard or routine cares, or non-pharmacological methods. The evaluation of studies in terms of risk of bias was conducted using the Cochrane Handbook. Meta-analysis results were reported as OR and 95% confidence interval. In meta-analysis, subgroup analysis was performed based on the type of intervention. Due to the heterogeneity of over 30%, a random effect was reported instead of the fixed effect. The heterogeneity was evaluated using I-2, T-2 and Chi(2). The evaluation of the quality of the studies was also examined using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE) approach. Results: The results of 7 studies with low-quality in meta-analysis, showed that pharmacological methods significantly improved satisfaction with birth experience (OR = 2.99; 95% CI: 1.37 to 6.52; P = 0.006). However, meta-analysis of subgroups showed that only inhalation of Entonox gas (OR = 6.51; 95% CI: 3.47 to 12.22; P < 0.001), in contrast to epidural analgesia (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.62 to 2.27; P = 0.60) and Hyoscine injection (OR = 2.58; 95% CI: 0.93 to 7.20; P = 0.07) significantly improved satisfaction with birth experience. Conclusion: Pharmacological interventions such as epidural, although introduced as one of the effective methods for pain relief may not provide women with satisfaction with birth. However, more studies with precise methodology, high sample size, and standard tools should be performed to more accurately investigate the effect of pharmacological interventions on the birth experience.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 69
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour (Review) [J].
Anim-Somuah, Millicent ;
Smyth, Rebecca M. D. ;
Cyna, Allan M. ;
Cuthbert, Anna .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (05)
[2]   The Impact of Labour Epidural Analgesia on the Childbirth Expectation and Experience at a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India [J].
Bhatt, Hitanshu ;
Pandya, Sunil ;
Kolar, Geeta ;
Nirmalan, Praveen Kumar .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 8 (03) :73-76
[3]   Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey - Twenty-year update [J].
Bucklin, BA ;
Hawkins, JL ;
Anderson, JR ;
Ullrich, FA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 103 (03) :645-653
[4]  
Christiaens Wendy, 2007, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, V7, P26
[5]  
Christiansen Pia, 2002, Ugeskr Laeger, V164, P4927
[6]   Satisfaction, control and pain relief: short- and long-term assessments in a randomised controlled trial of low-dose and traditional epidurals and a non-epidural comparison group [J].
Cooper, G. M. ;
MacArthur, C. ;
Wilson, M. J. A. ;
Moore, P. A. S. ;
Shennan, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 19 (01) :31-37
[7]  
de Orange FA, 2012, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V58, P112
[8]   Maternal satisfaction with childbirth and intrapartum analgesia in nulliparous labour [J].
Dickinson, JE ;
Paech, MJ ;
McDonald, SJ ;
Evans, SF .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) :463-468
[9]   Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour [J].
Dowswell, Therese ;
Bedwell, Carol ;
Lavender, Tina ;
Neilson, James P. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (02)
[10]   Women's perceptions and experiences of a traumatic birth: a meta-ethnography [J].
Elmir, Rakime ;
Schmied, Virginia ;
Wilkes, Lesley ;
Jackson, Debra .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2010, 66 (10) :2142-2153