The Paris Climate Agreement and the Three Largest Emitters: China, the United States, and the European Union

被引:49
作者
Schreurs, Miranda A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Bavarian Sch Publ Policy, D-80333 Munich, Germany
关键词
China; climate change; European Union; leadership; Paris; United States;
D O I
10.17645/pag.v4i3.666
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The Paris Agreement would not have come into being had China, the United States (US), and the European Union (EU), which together contribute more than half of all global greenhouse gas emissions, not signaled their intent to take major steps to reduce their domestic emissions. The EU has been at the forefront of global climate change measures for years having issued binding domestic emission reduction targets for 2020 and 2030. For many years, China refused to announce a target date for when it might begin reducing its greenhouse gas emissions, and the US Congress blocked action on climate change. In the lead up to the Paris climate negotiations, however, there were major shifts in China's and the US's climate positions. This commentary examines the climate policies of the three largest emitters and the factors motivating the positions they took in the Paris negotiations. Given that the commitments made in Paris are most likely insufficient to keep global temperature from rising 2 degrees C above pre-industrial levels, the commentary also considers what the likelihood is that these three major economies will strengthen their emission reduction targets in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 223
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 430R15004 EPA
[2]  
Chen K., 2014, REUTERS 0831
[3]   Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C [J].
Rogelj, Joeri ;
den Elzen, Michel ;
Hoehne, Niklas ;
Fransen, Taryn ;
Fekete, Hanna ;
Winkler, Harald ;
Chaeffer, Roberto S. ;
Ha, Fus ;
Riahi, Keywan ;
Meinshausen, Malte .
NATURE, 2016, 534 (7609) :631-639
[4]   Part one: Negotiating international environmental regimes - Leadership revisited [J].
Skodvin, Toro ;
Andresen, Steinar .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2006, 6 (03) :13-+
[5]  
Underdal A., 1998, POLITICS INT ENV MAN, P101, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-4946-4_6
[6]  
Underdal A., 1994, INT MULTILATERAL NEG, P178
[7]   Can conditional commitments break the climate change negotiations deadlock? [J].
Underdal, Arild ;
Hovi, Jon ;
Kallbekken, Steffen ;
Skodvin, Tora .
INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2012, 33 (04) :475-493