Multivariate mapping of soil with structural equation modelling

被引:42
作者
Angelini, M. E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Heuvelink, G. B. M. [1 ,2 ]
Kempen, B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Soil Geog & Landscape Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 3 Bldg 101,POB 47, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] ISRIC World Soil Informat, Droevendaalsesteeg 3 Bldg 101,POB 353, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Inst Suelos, INTA CIRN, N Repetto & Los Reseros S-N, RA-1686 Hurlingham, Argentina
关键词
SPATIAL PREDICTION; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1111/ejss.12446
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
In a previous study we introduced structural equation modelling (SEM) for digital soil mapping in the Argentine Pampas. An attractive property of SEM is that it incorporates pedological knowledge explicitly through a mathematical implementation of a conceptual model. Many soil processes operate within the soil profile; therefore, SEM might be suitable for simultaneous prediction of soil properties for multiple soil layers. In this way, relations between soil properties in different horizons can be included that might result in more consistent predictions. The objectives of this study were therefore to apply SEM to multi-layer and multivariate soil mapping, and to test SEM functionality for suggestions to improve the modelling. We applied SEM to model and predict the lateral and vertical distribution of the cation exchange capacity (CEC), organic carbon (OC) and clay content of three major soil horizons, A, B and C, for a 23000-km(2) region in the Argentine Pampas. We developed a conceptual model based on pedological hypotheses. Next, we derived a mathematical model and calibrated it with environmental covariates and soil data from 320 soil profiles. Cross-validation of predicted soil properties showed that SEM explained only marginally more of the variance than a linear regression model. However, assessment of the covariation showed that SEM reproduces the covariance between variables much more accurately than linear regression. We concluded that SEM can be used to predict several soil properties in multiple layers by considering the interrelations between soil properties and layers.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 591
页数:17
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
Iriondo M, 2004, REV MEX CIENC GEOL, V21, P175
[12]  
Joreskog K.G., 1981, Lisrel 5: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods
[13]  
[user's guide]
[14]   Three-dimensional mapping of soil organic matter content using soil type-specific depth functions [J].
Kempen, B. ;
Brus, D. J. ;
Stoorvogel, J. J. .
GEODERMA, 2011, 162 (1-2) :107-123
[15]  
Kline R. B., 2016, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, V4th
[16]  
Krause P., 2005, Advances in Geosciences, V5, P89, DOI [10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005, DOI 10.5194/ADGEO-5-89-2005]
[17]   Spatially explicit structural equation modeling [J].
Lamb, Eric G. ;
Mengersen, Kerrie L. ;
Stewart, Katherine J. ;
Attanayake, Udayanga ;
Siciliano, Steven D. .
ECOLOGY, 2014, 95 (09) :2434-2442
[18]   A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey [J].
Lark, RM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2000, 51 (01) :137-157
[19]   In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings [J].
Marsh, HW ;
Hau, KT ;
Wen, ZL .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2004, 11 (03) :320-341
[20]   Digital soil mapping: A brief history and some lessons [J].
Minasny, Budiman ;
McBratney, Alex B. .
GEODERMA, 2016, 264 :301-311