Metaphorical language processing and amygdala activation in L1 and L2

被引:17
|
作者
Citron, Francesca M. M. [1 ]
Michaelis, Nora [2 ]
Goldberg, Adele E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Psychol, Lancaster, England
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Princeton Univ, Psychol Dept, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
Multilingualism; Metaphor; Amygdala; Emotion; fMRI; IFG; BRAINS DEFAULT NETWORK; WORD RECOGNITION; RIGHT-HEMISPHERE; NEURAL BASIS; CONVENTIONAL METAPHORS; CONVERGING EVIDENCE; BILINGUAL BRAIN; FUNCTIONAL MRI; WORKING-MEMORY; TEMPORAL-LOBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107381
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study aims to investigate the neural correlates of processing conventional figurative language in nonnative speakers in a comparison with native speakers. Italian proficient L2 learners of German and German native speakers read conventional metaphorical statements as well as literal paraphrases that were comparable on a range of psycholinguistic variables. Results confirm previous findings that native speakers show increased activity for metaphorical processing, and left amygdala activation increases with increasing Metaphoricity. At the whole-brain level, L2 learners showed the expected overall differences in activation when compared to native speakers (in the fronto-temporal network). But L2 speakers did not show any distinctive activation outside the caudate nucleus as Metaphoricity increased, suggesting that the L2 speakers were less affected by increasing Metaphoricity than native speakers were. With small volume correction, only a single peak in the amygdala reached threshold for L2 speakers as Metaphoricity increased. The findings are consistent with the view that metaphorical language is more engaging for native speakers but not necessarily for L2 speakers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Processing Hyponymy in L1 and L2
    Farzad Sharifian
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2002, 31 : 421 - 436
  • [2] Processing hyponymy in L1 and L2
    Sharifian, F
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2002, 31 (04) : 421 - 436
  • [3] ON THE METAPHORICAL LANGUAGE OF L2 RESEARCH
    DANAHY, M
    MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 1986, 70 (03): : 228 - 235
  • [4] Register in L1 and L2 language development
    Gray, Bethany
    Egbert, Jesse
    REGISTER STUDIES, 2021, 3 (02) : 177 - 179
  • [5] The influence of increasing discourse context on L1 and L2 spoken language processing
    Kohlstedt, Tatiana
    Mani, Nivedita
    BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2018, 21 (01) : 121 - 136
  • [6] The impact of language co-activation on L1 and L2 speech fluency
    Bergmann, Christopher
    Sprenger, Simone A.
    Schmid, Monika S.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2015, 161 : 25 - 35
  • [7] L2 Proficiency matters in comparative L1/L2 processing research
    Keating, Gregory D.
    BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2017, 20 (04) : 700 - 701
  • [8] L2 activation during L1 processing is increased by exposure but decreased by proficiency
    Berghoff, Robyn
    Bylund, Emanuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUALISM, 2024, 28 (03) : 555 - 569
  • [9] Cortical activation in the processing of passive sentences in L1 and L2: An fMRI study
    Yokoyama, S
    Okamoto, H
    Miyamoto, T
    Yoshimoto, K
    Kim, J
    Iwata, K
    Jeong, H
    Uchida, S
    Ikuta, N
    Sassa, Y
    Nakamura, W
    Horie, K
    Sato, S
    Kawashima, R
    NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 30 (02) : 570 - 579
  • [10] BOUND STEM PROCESSING IN L1 AND L2 ITALIAN
    Piccinin, Sabrina
    Dal Maso, Serena
    Giraudo, Helene
    LINGUE E LINGUAGGIO, 2018, 17 (02) : 289 - 305