Comparative effectiveness of environmental regulation instruments: Case of the Moroccan electricity mix

被引:1
作者
Bahetta, Soufiyan [1 ]
Dahhou, Nabil [1 ]
Hasnaoui, Rachid [1 ]
机构
[1] Ibn Tofail Univ Kenitra, Fac Econ & Management, Lab Econ & Management Org, Kenitra, Morocco
关键词
environmental regulation; electricity mix; energy transition; OSeMOSYS; optimisation; ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGY; POWER-GENERATION; POLICY; INCENTIVES; SCENARIOS; SYSTEM; COST;
D O I
10.3934/energy.2021050
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Fossil fuels dominate the electricity mix of Morocco, the country is placing renewable energy at the heart of its energy strategy, to improve the security of supply and ensure environmental sustainability. However, the penetration of renewable energy technologies (RET) in the Moroccan electricity mix remains low due to an excess of investment in conventional energy technologies. This study first explores the characteristics of the Moroccan electricity mix before studying the dynamic effects of environmental regulatory instruments, in particular the carbon tax and the emission standards. To do so, we analyzed scenarios using a bottom-up linear and dynamic optimization model "OSeMOSYS". We will therefore assess the impact of the carbon tax and the emission standards on RET adoption in the Moroccan electricity mix, over a period from 2015 to 2040. Our results suggest that environmental regulation in the electricity sector will lead to a large diversification of the Moroccan electricity mix with a large penetration of RET thus reducing the overall production of conventional energy technologies. Therefore, it follows that the carbon tax encourages the adoption of RET in the Moroccan electricity mix with significant reductions on fuel costs and operating & maintenance (O&M) costs of conventional energy technologies compared to emission standards.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1112
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Citroen N, 2015, PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICEIT 2015), P59, DOI 10.1109/EITech.2015.7162950
  • [12] Modeling Lebanon's electricity sector: Alternative scenarios and their implications
    Dagher, Leila
    Ruble, Isabella
    [J]. ENERGY, 2011, 36 (07) : 4315 - 4326
  • [13] The cost of decarbonizing the Canadian electricity system
    Dolter, Brett
    Rivers, Nicholas
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 113 : 135 - 148
  • [14] INNOVATION IN POLLUTION-CONTROL
    DOWNING, PB
    WHITE, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1986, 13 (01) : 18 - 29
  • [15] Ghazi F. el., 2021, Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, V11, P236, DOI [10.32479/ijeep.11036, DOI 10.32479/IJEEP.11036]
  • [16] Haidi T, 2021, INT J ELECT COMPUTER, V11, P2088
  • [17] Carbon pricing and supporting policy tools for deep decarbonization; case of electricity generation of Sri Lanka
    Herath, H. M. S. Amanda
    Jung, Tae Yong
    [J]. CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (05) : 465 - 484
  • [18] Herbst A., 2012, Swiss J. Econ. Stat, V148, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF03399363, 10.1007/BF03399363]
  • [19] OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System An introduction to its ethos, structure and development
    Howells, Mark
    Rogner, Holger
    Strachan, Neil
    Heaps, Charles
    Huntington, Hillard
    Kypreos, Socrates
    Hughes, Alison
    Silveira, Semida
    DeCarolis, Joe
    Bazillian, Morgan
    Roehrl, Alexander
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) : 5850 - 5870
  • [20] IEA, 2020, PROJ COSTS GEN EL, V2020