Comparative effectiveness of environmental regulation instruments: Case of the Moroccan electricity mix

被引:1
作者
Bahetta, Soufiyan [1 ]
Dahhou, Nabil [1 ]
Hasnaoui, Rachid [1 ]
机构
[1] Ibn Tofail Univ Kenitra, Fac Econ & Management, Lab Econ & Management Org, Kenitra, Morocco
关键词
environmental regulation; electricity mix; energy transition; OSeMOSYS; optimisation; ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGY; POWER-GENERATION; POLICY; INCENTIVES; SCENARIOS; SYSTEM; COST;
D O I
10.3934/energy.2021050
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Fossil fuels dominate the electricity mix of Morocco, the country is placing renewable energy at the heart of its energy strategy, to improve the security of supply and ensure environmental sustainability. However, the penetration of renewable energy technologies (RET) in the Moroccan electricity mix remains low due to an excess of investment in conventional energy technologies. This study first explores the characteristics of the Moroccan electricity mix before studying the dynamic effects of environmental regulatory instruments, in particular the carbon tax and the emission standards. To do so, we analyzed scenarios using a bottom-up linear and dynamic optimization model "OSeMOSYS". We will therefore assess the impact of the carbon tax and the emission standards on RET adoption in the Moroccan electricity mix, over a period from 2015 to 2040. Our results suggest that environmental regulation in the electricity sector will lead to a large diversification of the Moroccan electricity mix with a large penetration of RET thus reducing the overall production of conventional energy technologies. Therefore, it follows that the carbon tax encourages the adoption of RET in the Moroccan electricity mix with significant reductions on fuel costs and operating & maintenance (O&M) costs of conventional energy technologies compared to emission standards.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1112
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Abban J., 2021, Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, DOI [10.4236/sgre.2021.126006, DOI 10.4236/SGRE.2021.126006]
  • [2] Afif M., 2012, INCITATION ADOPTION
  • [3] Awopone AK, 2017, AIMS ENERGY, V5, P193, DOI 10.3934/energy.2017.2.193
  • [4] Bahetta S, 2021, REV AFR SCI J, V3, P382
  • [5] Bahetta S., 2021, Review of Economics and Finance, V19, P184
  • [6] Baumol W.J., 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
  • [7] Sustainable energy systems: Role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply-A review
    Bazmi, Aqeel Ahmed
    Zahedi, Gholamreza
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (08) : 3480 - 3500
  • [8] Carlsson J., 2014, ETRI 2014 ENERGY TEC
  • [9] Assessment of renewable energy transition in Moroccan electricity sector using a system dynamics approach
    Chentouf, Mohammed
    Allouch, Mohamed
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2021, 40 (04)
  • [10] Chiroleu-Assouline M., 2007, NOTES SYNTHESE SESP, V2, P7