Tenofovir alafenamide for prevention and treatment of hepatitis B virus reactivation and de novo hepatitis

被引:6
作者
Inada, Kento [1 ]
Kaneko, Shun [1 ]
Kurosaki, Masayuki [1 ]
Yamashita, Koji [1 ]
Kirino, Sakura [1 ]
Osawa, Leona [1 ]
Hayakawa, Yuka [1 ]
Sekiguchi, Shuhei [1 ]
Higuchi, Mayu [1 ]
Takaura, Kenta [1 ]
Maeyashiki, Chiaki [1 ]
Tamaki, Nobuharu [1 ]
Yasui, Yutaka [1 ]
Itakura, Jun [1 ]
Takahashi, Yuka [1 ]
Tsuchiya, Kaoru [1 ]
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Okamoto, Ryuichi [2 ]
Izumi, Namiki [1 ]
机构
[1] Musashino Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 1-26-1 Kyonan Cho, Musashino, Tokyo 1808610, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Tokyo, Japan
来源
JGH OPEN | 2021年 / 5卷 / 09期
关键词
de novo hepatitis; hepatitis B virus reactivation; tenofovir alafenamide; CYTOTOXIC CHEMOTHERAPY; DISOPROXIL FUMARATE; MANAGEMENT; INFECTION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/jgh3.12636
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim: Administration of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) as prevention or treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is not well known. The aim of this study is to reveal the efficacy and safety of TAF against HBV reactivation. Methods: Entecavir (ETV) and TAF were given to 66 and 11 patients, respectively, as prophylaxis against or treatment of HBV reactivation during chemotherapy or immune suppression therapy from January 2010 to June 2020. The antiviral effects and safety were assessed. Results: At week 24, the antiviral effects on patients receiving ETV and TAF were similar in terms of reduction of HBV DNA (-2.83 +/- 1.45log IU/mL vs -3.05 +/- 2.47log IU/mL; P = 0.857) and achieving undetectable levels of HBV DNA (78.8 vs 90.9%; P = 0.681). There was no significant difference in the decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the two groups (-0.62 +/- 11.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs -3.67 +/- 13.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.291). Conclusion: TAF is safe and effective against HBV reactivation.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1091
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Terrault Norah A, 2018, Hepatology, V67, P1560, DOI [10.1002/cld.728, 10.1002/hep.29800]
  • [22] Cost-Effectiveness of Tenofovir Alafenamide for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in Canada
    Tian, Feng
    Houle, Sherilyn K. D.
    Alsabbagh, Mhd. Wasem
    Wong, William W. L.
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [23] Comparison of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entecavir in the Prophylaxis of HBV Reactivation
    Toka, Bilal
    Koksal, Aydin Seref
    Eminler, Ahmet Tarik
    Tozlu, Mukaddes
    Uslan, Mustafa Ihsan
    Parlak, Erkan
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2021, 66 (07) : 2417 - 2426
  • [24] Yeo W, 2000, J MED VIROL, V62, P299, DOI 10.1002/1096-9071(200011)62:3<299::AID-JMV1>3.0.CO
  • [25] 2-0
  • [26] Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation
    Zhang, Min-Yue
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Shi, Ke-Qing
    Zheng, Ji-Na
    Cheng, Zhang
    Zou, Zhuo-Lin
    Huang, Hong-Hui
    Chen, Fang-Yuan
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (21) : 30661 - 30677
  • [27] Hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients with positive Hepatitis B surface antigen undergoing PD-1 inhibition
    Zhang, Xuanye
    Zhou, Yixin
    Chen, Chen
    Fang, Wenfeng
    Cai, Xiuyu
    Zhang, Xiaoshi
    Zhao, Ming
    Zhang, Bei
    Jiang, Wenqi
    Lin, Zuan
    Ma, Yuxiang
    Yang, Yunpeng
    Huang, Yan
    Zhao, Hongyun
    Xu, Ruihua
    Hong, Shaodong
    Zhang, Li
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2019, 7 (01):
  • [28] Hepatitis B virus resistance to antiviral drugs: where are we going?
    Zoulim, Fabien
    [J]. LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 : 111 - 116