Personality traits as predictors of language learner engagement

被引:11
作者
Angelovska, Tanja [1 ]
Mercer, Sarah [2 ]
Talbot, Kyle Read [2 ]
机构
[1] Paris Lodron Univ Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Graz, Austria
关键词
age; Big-Five; engagement; language learning engagement; personality; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; ACADEMIC MOTIVATION; 5-FACTOR MODEL; SELF-EFFICACY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1515/cercles-2021-2026
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Engagement is seen as a highly desirable outcome and process contributing to successful learning. In second language acquisition (SLA), we know comparatively little about the nature of engagement for learning a language, in particular the kind of individual differences in learners that account for variations in engagement. In this study, we investigate whether a relationship exists between the engagement of tertiary-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students and one key individual difference, student personality traits, as measured by Goldberg, Lewis R. 1992. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment 4(1). 26-42, Big-Five Personality Markers. Participants in this study were 154 EFL tertiary-level students from two universities in Austria. Language learning engagement (LLE) was measured using a modified version of the standardized Student Engagement Instrument (Appleton et al. 2006) adapted specifically for the tertiary-level EFL context in which this study was conducted. The study revealed that trait neuroticism and age predicted LLE and its two dimensions, the cognitive and the affective. Pedagogical implications of the study are presented and discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 310
页数:26
相关论文
共 75 条
[21]   Personality and speech production: a pilot study of second language learners [J].
Dewaele, JM ;
Furnham, A .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2000, 28 (02) :355-365
[22]   Self-Determination and Classroom Engagement of EFL Learners: A Mixed-Methods Study of the Self-System Model of Motivational Development [J].
Dincer, Ali ;
Yesilyurt, Savas ;
Noels, Kimberly A. ;
Lascano, Dayuma I. Vargas .
SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (02)
[23]   Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement [J].
Diseth, Å .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2003, 17 (02) :143-155
[24]  
Dornyei Z., 2015, PSYCHOL LANGUAGE LEA, DOI [10.4324/9781315779553, DOI 10.4324/9781315779553]
[25]  
Dornyei Z., 2005, The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition, DOI [DOI 10.1177/13621688070110040802, DOI 10.4324/9781410613349]
[26]  
Finn JD, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P97, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
[27]   School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence [J].
Fredricks, JA ;
Blumenfeld, PC ;
Paris, AH .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (01) :59-109
[28]   PERSONALITY INTELLIGENCE RELATIONS - ASSESSMENT OF TYPICAL INTELLECTUAL ENGAGEMENT [J].
GOFF, M ;
ACKERMAN, PL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (04) :537-552
[29]  
Goldberg LR., 1992, Psychol Assess, V4, P26, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26, 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26]
[30]  
Henning MA, 2018, ROU RES ED PSYCH, P1