Personality traits as predictors of language learner engagement

被引:11
作者
Angelovska, Tanja [1 ]
Mercer, Sarah [2 ]
Talbot, Kyle Read [2 ]
机构
[1] Paris Lodron Univ Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Graz, Austria
关键词
age; Big-Five; engagement; language learning engagement; personality; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; ACADEMIC MOTIVATION; 5-FACTOR MODEL; SELF-EFFICACY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1515/cercles-2021-2026
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Engagement is seen as a highly desirable outcome and process contributing to successful learning. In second language acquisition (SLA), we know comparatively little about the nature of engagement for learning a language, in particular the kind of individual differences in learners that account for variations in engagement. In this study, we investigate whether a relationship exists between the engagement of tertiary-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students and one key individual difference, student personality traits, as measured by Goldberg, Lewis R. 1992. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment 4(1). 26-42, Big-Five Personality Markers. Participants in this study were 154 EFL tertiary-level students from two universities in Austria. Language learning engagement (LLE) was measured using a modified version of the standardized Student Engagement Instrument (Appleton et al. 2006) adapted specifically for the tertiary-level EFL context in which this study was conducted. The study revealed that trait neuroticism and age predicted LLE and its two dimensions, the cognitive and the affective. Pedagogical implications of the study are presented and discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 310
页数:26
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   TYPICAL INTELLECTUAL ENGAGEMENT AND PERSONALITY - REPLY [J].
ACKERMAN, PL ;
GOFF, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 86 (01) :150-153
[2]  
Ainley M, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P283, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_13
[3]   Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument [J].
Appleton, James J. ;
Christenson, Sandra L. ;
Kim, Dongjin ;
Reschly, Amy L. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 44 (05) :427-445
[4]   A Study of the Factorial Invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results From Middle and High School Students [J].
Betts, Joseph E. ;
Appleton, James J. ;
Reschly, Amy L. ;
Christenson, Sandra L. ;
Huebner, E. Scott .
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2010, 25 (02) :84-93
[5]   Student engagement and wellbeing over time at a higher education institution [J].
Boulton, Chris A. ;
Hughes, Emily ;
Kent, Carmel ;
Smith, Joanne R. ;
Williams, Hywel T. P. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11)
[6]   Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education [J].
Busato, VV ;
Prins, FJ ;
Elshout, JJ ;
Hamaker, C .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2000, 29 (06) :1057-1068
[7]   Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students [J].
Caraway, K ;
Tucker, CM ;
Reinke, WM ;
Hall, C .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2003, 40 (04) :417-427
[8]   Mainly Openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches [J].
Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas ;
Furnham, Adrian .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 19 (04) :524-529
[9]  
Christenson SL, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
[10]   Examining relationships between academic motivation and personality among college students [J].
Clark, M. H. ;
Schroth, Christopher A. .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2010, 20 (01) :19-24