Laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy: Development of a technique simplified by application of nitinol clips and a wet monopolar electrosurgery device

被引:7
作者
Vanlangendonck, R [1 ]
Venkatesh, R [1 ]
Vulin, C [1 ]
Quayle, S [1 ]
Morrissey, K [1 ]
Landman, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Urol Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2005.19.225
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We developed a technique for laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy with the use of intracorporeal suturing and subsequently simplified the technique by application of experimental Nitimol((R)) clips. Materials and Methods: We performed laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy on 16 domestic swine divided into four groups of four animals each. The kidney was exposed laparoscopically, and the renal artery was atraumatically clamped. The lower pole of the kidney was amputated to expose a lower-pole calix, and hemostasis of the cut renal surface was obtained with a wet monopolar electrosurgical device (Floating Ball device [FB]; TissueLink, Dover, NH). Anastomosis of the ureter to the lower-pole calix was performed over a guidewire using 3-0 Vicryl suture in group 1 and Nitinol clips in group 3. A double-J ureteral stent was then deployed retrograde under fluoroscopic guidance. In addition, we evaluated the use of fibrin glue as a sealant over the sutured or clipped anastomotic site (groups 2 and 4, respectively). Ureteral stents were removed after 3 weeks, and the animals were evaluated and sacrificed after an additional 3 weeks. Results: Laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy was completed in all 16 animals. In each case, excellent renal parenchymal hemostasis was obtained with the FB device, with a mean hemostasis time of 4.1 minutes. The mean anastomotic time with standard suture reconstruction was 37.1 +/- 5.4 minutes, while the anastomotic time with the Nitinol clips was 29.0 +/- 8.0 minutes (P = 0.0339). Retrograde pyelograms in groups 1 and 3 (no fibrin glue) showed a patent anastomosis with no hydronephrosis in three of the four animals in each group. One animal in group 1 and one animal in group 3 developed large urinomas secondary to anastomotic failure. The animals that received fibrin glue over the anastomotic site (groups 2 and 4) all showed narrowed anastomoses with severe hydronephrosis. Conclusions: With available instrumentation, laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy is technically feasible. Nitinol clip technology significantly reduces collecting-system reconstruction time. Application of fibrin glue as a urinary tract sealant resulted in an unexpected adverse outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 229
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BARRIERAS D, 2002, J UROLOGY, V164, P1106
[2]   Laparoscopic pyeloplasty - Indications, technique, and long-term outcome [J].
Chen, RN ;
Moore, RG ;
Kavoussi, LR .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 25 (02) :323-+
[3]  
Danuser H, 1998, J UROLOGY, V159, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64011-4
[4]   Extraperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered fibrin glued pyeloplasty: medium-term results [J].
Eden, CG ;
Sultana, SR ;
Murray, KHA ;
Carruthers, RK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (03) :382-389
[5]   Use of titanium staples during upper tract laparoscopic reconstructive surgery: Initial experience [J].
Grubb, RL ;
Sundaram, CP ;
Yan, Y ;
Chen, C ;
McDougall, EM ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (04) :1366-1369
[6]   URETEROCALICOSTOMY - ALTERNATIVE TO NEPHRECTOMY [J].
HAWTHORNE, NJ ;
ZINCKE, H ;
KELALIS, PP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1976, 115 (05) :583-586
[7]   Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for small renal cell carcinoma [J].
Janetschek, G ;
Daffner, P ;
Peschel, R ;
Bartsch, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (04) :1152-1155
[8]   Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases [J].
Jarrett, TW ;
Chan, DY ;
Charambura, TC ;
Fugita, O ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1253-1256
[9]  
LEE DI, UNPUB EVALUATION NIT
[10]   URETEROCALICOSTOMY FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF COMPLICATED PELVIURETERIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION [J].
ROSS, JH ;
STREEM, SB ;
NOVICK, AC ;
KAY, R ;
MONTIE, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 65 (04) :322-325