Second rate or a second chance? Assessing biomass and biodiversity recovery in regenerating Amazonian forests

被引:117
|
作者
Lennox, Gareth D. [1 ]
Gardner, Toby A. [2 ,3 ]
Thomson, James R. [4 ,5 ]
Ferreira, Joice [6 ]
Berenguer, Erika [7 ]
Lees, Alexander C. [8 ,9 ]
Mac Nally, Ralph [4 ,10 ]
Aragao, Luiz E. O. C. [11 ,12 ]
Ferraz, Silvio F. B. [13 ]
Louzada, Julio [14 ]
Moura, Nargila G. [15 ]
Oliveira, Victor H. F. [14 ]
Pardini, Renata [16 ]
Solar, Ricardo R. C. [17 ]
Vaz-de Mello, Fernando Z. [18 ]
Vieira, Ima C. G. [15 ]
Barlow, Jos [15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lib Ave, Lancaster, England
[2] Stockholm Environm Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Int Inst Sustainabil, Estr Dona Castorina, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Univ Canberra, Inst Appl Ecol, Bruce, ACT, Australia
[5] Arthur Rylah Inst Environm Res, Dept Environm Land Water & Planning, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[6] EMBRAPA Amazonia Oriental, Belem, Para, Brazil
[7] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford, England
[8] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Sch Sci & Environm, Div Biol & Conservat Ecol, Manchester, Lancs, England
[9] Cornell Univ, Cornell Lab Ornithol, Ithaca, NY USA
[10] Sunrise Ecol Res Inst, Ocean Grove, Vic, Australia
[11] Natl Inst Space Res INPE, Remote Sensing Div, Trop Ecosyst & Environm Sci Grp TREES, Ave Astronautas, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[12] Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Exeter, Devon, England
[13] Univ Sao Paulo, Esalq, Piracicaba, Brazil
[14] Univ Fed Lavras, Setor Ecol & Conservacao, Lavras, Brazil
[15] MCTI Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, Para, Brazil
[16] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Biociencias, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[17] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Inst Ciencias Biol, Dept Biol Geral, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[18] Univ Fed Mato Grosso, Inst Biociencias, Dept Biol & Zool, Cuiaba, Brazil
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Amazon; biodiversity; biomass; carbon; forest succession; secondary forests; species composition; species richness; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; TROPICAL FORESTS; SECONDARY SUCCESSION; ANTHROPOGENIC DISTURBANCE; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; NEOTROPICAL FORESTS; SPECIES RICHNESS; UNCERTAIN FUTURE; SEED DISPERSAL; CO-BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.14443
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Secondary forests (SFs) regenerating on previously deforested land account for large, expanding areas of tropical forest cover. Given that tropical forests rank among Earth's most important reservoirs of carbon and biodiversity, SFs play an increasingly pivotal role in the carbon cycle and as potential habitat for forest biota. Nevertheless, their capacity to regain the biotic attributes of undisturbed primary forests (UPFs) remains poorly understood. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of SF recovery, using extensive tropical biodiversity, biomass, and environmental datasets. These data, collected in 59 naturally regenerating SFs and 30 co-located UPFs in the eastern Amazon, cover >1,600 large- and small-stemmed plant, bird, and dung beetles species and a suite of forest structure, landscape context, and topoedaphic predictors. After up to 40 years of regeneration, the SFs we surveyed showed a high degree of biodiversity resilience, recovering, on average among taxa, 88% and 85% mean UPF species richness and composition, respectively. Across the first 20 years of succession, the period for which we have accurate SF age data, biomass recovered at 1.2% per year, equivalent to a carbon uptake rate of 2.25 Mg/ha per year, while, on average, species richness and composition recovered at 2.6% and 2.3% per year, respectively. For all taxonomic groups, biomass was strongly associated with SF species distributions. However, other variables describing habitat complexity-canopy cover and understory stem density-were equally important occurrence predictors for most taxa. Species responses to biomass revealed a successional transition at approximately 75 Mg/ha, marking the influx of high-conservation-value forest species. Overall, our results show that naturally regenerating SFs can accumulate substantial amounts of carbon and support many forest species. However, given that the surveyed SFs failed to return to a typical UPF state, SFs are not substitutes for UPFs.
引用
收藏
页码:5680 / 5694
页数:15
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Limited biomass recovery from gold mining in Amazonian forests
    Kalamandeen, Michelle
    Gloor, Emanuel
    Johnson, Isaac
    Agard, Shenelle
    Katow, Martin
    Vanbrooke, Ashmore
    Ashley, David
    Batterman, Sarah A.
    Ziv, Guy
    Holder-Collins, Kaslyn
    Phillips, Oliver L.
    Brondizio, Eduardo S.
    Vieira, Ima
    Galbraith, David
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (09) : 1730 - 1740
  • [2] Invasive alien acacias rapidly stock carbon, but threaten biodiversity recovery in young second-growth forests
    Matos, Fabio A. R.
    Edwards, David P. P.
    Magnago, Luiz Fernando S.
    Heringer, Gustavo
    Neri, Andreza Viana
    Buttschardt, Tillmann
    Zenni, Rafael Dudeque
    de Menezes, Luis Fernando Tavares
    Saiter, Felipe Zamborlini
    Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Goncalves Reynaud
    Safar, Nathalia Vieira Hissa
    Da Silva, Monica Pacheco
    Simonelli, Marcelo
    Martins, Sebastiao V.
    Brancalion, Pedro Henrique Santin
    Meira-Neto, Joao Augusto A.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 378 (1867)
  • [3] Recovery of understory vegetation biomass and biodiversity in burned larch boreal forests in Northeastern China
    Ma, Jun
    Bu, Rencang
    Liu, Miao
    Chang, Yu
    Han, Fenglin
    Qin, Qin
    Hu, Yuanman
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2016, 31 (04) : 382 - 393
  • [4] Challenges of Governing Second-Growth Forests: A Case Study from the Brazilian Amazonian State of Par
    Guimaraes Vieira, Ima Celia
    Gardner, Toby
    Ferreira, Joice
    Lees, Alexander C.
    Barlow, Jos
    FORESTS, 2014, 5 (07): : 1737 - 1752
  • [5] Assessing impacts of intensified biomass production and biodiversity protection on ecosystem services provided by European forests
    Verkerk, P. J.
    Mavsar, R.
    Giergiczny, M.
    Lindner, M.
    Edwards, D.
    Schelhaas, M. J.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 9 : 155 - 165
  • [6] ASSESSING GENOTYPES IN SECOND ROTATION FOR LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS PRODUCTION
    Oliveira, N.
    Ciria, P.
    Camps, F.
    Sanchez-Gonzalez, M.
    Sanchez, M.
    Canellas, I.
    Sixto, H.
    PAPERS OF THE 23RD EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2015, : 205 - 209
  • [7] Patterns and controls on island-wide aboveground biomass accumulation in second-growth forests of Puerto Rico
    Martinuzzi, Sebastian
    Cook, Bruce D.
    Helmer, Eileen H.
    Keller, Michael
    Locke, Dexter H.
    Marcano-Vega, Humfredo
    Uriarte, Maria
    Morton, Douglas C.
    BIOTROPICA, 2022, 54 (05) : 1146 - 1159
  • [8] Land use intensity determines soil properties and biomass recovery after abandonment of agricultural land in an Amazonian biodiversity hotspot
    Rebola, Loic Cecilio
    Paz, Claudia Pandolfo
    Valenzuela Gamarra, Luis
    Burslem, David F. R. P.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 801
  • [9] Are secondary forests second-rate? Comparing peatland greenhouse gas emissions, chemical and microbial community properties between primary and secondary forests in Peninsular Malaysia
    Dhandapani, Selvakumar
    Ritz, Karl
    Evers, Stephanie
    Yule, Catherine M.
    Sjogersten, Sofie
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 655 : 220 - 231