German version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale Translation and evaluation of measurement properties

被引:0
|
作者
Gordt, Katharina [1 ]
Mikolaizak, A. Stefanie [2 ]
Nerz, Corinna [2 ]
Barz, Carolin [2 ]
Gerhardy, Thomas [1 ]
Weber, Michaela [1 ]
Becker, Clemens [2 ]
Schwenk, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Network Aging Res, Bergheimer Str 20, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Dept Clin Gerontol, Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Sport & Sport Sci, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE | 2019年 / 52卷 / 01期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Postural balance; Assessment; Translation; Outcome measures; Elderly; SELF-EFFICACY; WALK TEST; VALIDITY; PERFORMANCE; INDIVIDUALS; PEOPLE; STAND; RISK; GAIT; GO;
D O I
10.1007/s00391-018-1374-z
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundTools to detect subtle balance deficits in high-functioning community-dwelling older adults are lacking. The Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBM) is avaluable tool to measure balance deficits in this group; however, it is not yet available in the German language.ObjectiveThe aim was 1)to translate and cross-culturally adapt the CBM into the German language and 2)to investigate the measurement properties of the German CBM (G-CBM).Material and methodsThe original CBM was translated into the German language according to established guidelines. A total of 51 older adults (mean age 69.97.1years) were recruited to measure construct validity by comparing the G-CBM against standardized balance and/or mobility assessments including the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 3m Tandem Walk (3MTW), 8Level Balance Scale (8LBS), 30s Chair Stand Test (30CST), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, gait speed, and the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). Intrarater and interrater reliability and internal consistency reliability were estimated using intraclass correlations (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. Ceiling effects were calculated as the percentage of the sample scoring the maximum score.ResultsThe G-CBM correlated excellently with FAB and BBS (=0.78-0.85; P<0.001), good with 3MTW, TUG, and FES-I (=-0.55 to -0.61; P<0.001), and moderately with 8LBS, 30CST, and habitual gait speed (=0.32-0.46; P<0.001). Intrarater (ICC3,k=0.998; P<0.001) and interrater (ICC2,k=0.996; P<0.001) reliability, and internal consistency reliability (=0.998) were also high. The G-CBM did not show ceiling effects.ConclusionThe G-CBM is avalid and reliable tool for measuring subtle balance deficits in older high-functioning adults. The absence of ceiling effects emphasizes the use of this scale in this cohort. The G-CBM can now be utilized in clinical practice. ZusammenfassungHintergrundInstrumente zur Identifikation leichter Balanceeinschrankungen bei selbststandig zuhause lebenden, alteren Erwachsenen in einer guten korperlichen Verfassung sind bislang fur den deutschsprachigen Gebrauch kaum wissenschaftlich evaluiert. Die Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBM) ist ein geeignetes Instrument zur Erfassung von Balanceeinschrankungen in dieser Personengruppe. Allerdings existiert fur die CBM bislang keine deutschsprachige Version.ZielZiel dieser Studie war 1.die standardisierte ubersetzung der CBM ins Deutsche (G-CBM) und deren interkulturelle Adaptation und 2.die uberprufung der Gutekriterien der G-CBM.Material und MethodenDie englischsprachige Original-CBM wurde gema ss internationalen Leitlinien ubersetzt. In die Studie wurden 51 altere Erwachsene (69,97,1Jahre) eingeschlossen. Die Konstruktvaliditat wurde anhand von Korrelationen mit etablierten Instrumenten zur Balance- und/oder Mobilitatsprufung, wie der Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 3m Tandemgang (3MTW), 8Level Balance Scale (8LBS), 30s-Aufstehtest (30CST), Timed up and Go (TUG) Test, Ganggeschwindigkeit und Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), bestimmt. Zudem wurden Intrarater- und Interrater-Reliabilitat (Intraklassenkorrelationskoeffizient, [ICC]) und interne Konsistenz (Cronbachs) untersucht. Deckeneffekte wurden als Prozentsatz der Probanden, die die maximale Punktzahl erreichten, berechnet. ErgebnisseDie G-CBM korrelierte hoch mit FAB und BBS (=0,78 bis 0,85; P<0,001), gut mit 3MTW, TUG, und FES-I (=-0,55 bis -0,61; P<0,001) sowie moderat mit 8LBS, 30CST und der Ganggeschwindigkeit (=0,32 bis 0,46; P<0,001). Die Intrarater- (ICC3,k=0,998; P<0,001) und Interrater-Reliabilitat (ICC2,k=0,996; P<0,001) sowie interne Konsistenz (=0,998) waren hoch. Die G-CBM zeigte keine Deckeneffekte.DiskussionDie G-CBM ist ein valides und reliables Instrument zur Messung leichter Balanceeinschrankungen bei alteren Erwachsenen in guter korperlicher Verfassung. Das Nichtvorhandensein von Deckeneffekten unterstreicht den Nutzen der Skala in dieser Gruppe. Die G-CBM ist nun fur den Einsatz im deutschsprachigen Raum verfugbar.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] German version of the engagement of a person with dementia scale: translation and initial application experiences
    Seibert, Kathrin
    Domhoff, Dominik
    Fricke, Jacob
    Wolf-Ostermann, Karin
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2025, 58 (02): : 109 - 114
  • [22] Reliability and validity of the community balance and mobility scale in individuals with multiple sclerosis
    Ozbas, Ezgi
    Balkan, Ayla Fil
    Salci, Yeliz
    Akyol, Betul
    Ozen, Nazire Pinar Acar
    Tuncer, Meryem Asli
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, 2024, : 385 - 393
  • [23] Activities-specific balance confidence scale: a Rasch evaluation of the Arabic version in lower-limb prosthetic users
    Bakhsh, Hadeel R.
    Atallah, Huthaifa M.
    Kablan, Nilufer
    Ferriero, Giorgio
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [24] Validity and Reliability of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
    Takacs, Judit
    Garland, S. Jayne
    Carpenter, Mark G.
    Hunt, Michael A.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 94 (06): : 866 - 874
  • [25] Dimensions of Delusional Experience Scale: A Psychometric Evaluation of a German Version
    Bueche, Liesa
    Gentner, Nana Christina
    Kaiser, Stefan
    von Bock, Anique
    Grupe, Stefanie
    Joest, Katharina
    Barthel, Andreas
    Vedder, Helmut
    Mundt, Christoph
    Kronmueller, Klaus-Thomas
    PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 43 (03) : 189 - 196
  • [26] The German version of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale: Translation, cross-cultural adaption and evaluation of its psychometric properties
    Egger, Marion
    Steinboeck, Martina
    Mueller, Friedemann
    Bergmann, Jeannine
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 36 (02) : 272 - 282
  • [27] Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Elderly-Constipation Impact Scale: a translation and validation study
    Zheng, Chen
    Yang, Zhen
    Kong, Linghui
    Gao, Ziyun
    Lu, Tingting
    Zhang, Huijun
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [28] Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 in a community sample
    Ruzanska, Ulrike Alexandra
    Warschburger, Petra
    APPETITE, 2017, 117 : 126 - 134
  • [29] Measurement properties of the backward walk test in people with balance and mobility deficits: A systematic review
    Hao, Jie
    Pu, Yuqi
    He, Zhengting
    Remis, Andreas
    Yao, Zixuan
    Li, Yanfei
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2024, 110 : 1 - 9
  • [30] Psychometric properties of a German version of the neck pain and disability scale
    Martin Scherer
    Eva Blozik
    Wolfgang Himmel
    Daria Laptinskaya
    Michael M. Kochen
    Christoph Herrmann-Lingen
    European Spine Journal, 2008, 17 : 922 - 929