German version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale Translation and evaluation of measurement properties

被引:0
|
作者
Gordt, Katharina [1 ]
Mikolaizak, A. Stefanie [2 ]
Nerz, Corinna [2 ]
Barz, Carolin [2 ]
Gerhardy, Thomas [1 ]
Weber, Michaela [1 ]
Becker, Clemens [2 ]
Schwenk, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Network Aging Res, Bergheimer Str 20, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Dept Clin Gerontol, Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Sport & Sport Sci, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE | 2019年 / 52卷 / 01期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Postural balance; Assessment; Translation; Outcome measures; Elderly; SELF-EFFICACY; WALK TEST; VALIDITY; PERFORMANCE; INDIVIDUALS; PEOPLE; STAND; RISK; GAIT; GO;
D O I
10.1007/s00391-018-1374-z
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundTools to detect subtle balance deficits in high-functioning community-dwelling older adults are lacking. The Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBM) is avaluable tool to measure balance deficits in this group; however, it is not yet available in the German language.ObjectiveThe aim was 1)to translate and cross-culturally adapt the CBM into the German language and 2)to investigate the measurement properties of the German CBM (G-CBM).Material and methodsThe original CBM was translated into the German language according to established guidelines. A total of 51 older adults (mean age 69.97.1years) were recruited to measure construct validity by comparing the G-CBM against standardized balance and/or mobility assessments including the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 3m Tandem Walk (3MTW), 8Level Balance Scale (8LBS), 30s Chair Stand Test (30CST), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, gait speed, and the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). Intrarater and interrater reliability and internal consistency reliability were estimated using intraclass correlations (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. Ceiling effects were calculated as the percentage of the sample scoring the maximum score.ResultsThe G-CBM correlated excellently with FAB and BBS (=0.78-0.85; P<0.001), good with 3MTW, TUG, and FES-I (=-0.55 to -0.61; P<0.001), and moderately with 8LBS, 30CST, and habitual gait speed (=0.32-0.46; P<0.001). Intrarater (ICC3,k=0.998; P<0.001) and interrater (ICC2,k=0.996; P<0.001) reliability, and internal consistency reliability (=0.998) were also high. The G-CBM did not show ceiling effects.ConclusionThe G-CBM is avalid and reliable tool for measuring subtle balance deficits in older high-functioning adults. The absence of ceiling effects emphasizes the use of this scale in this cohort. The G-CBM can now be utilized in clinical practice. ZusammenfassungHintergrundInstrumente zur Identifikation leichter Balanceeinschrankungen bei selbststandig zuhause lebenden, alteren Erwachsenen in einer guten korperlichen Verfassung sind bislang fur den deutschsprachigen Gebrauch kaum wissenschaftlich evaluiert. Die Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBM) ist ein geeignetes Instrument zur Erfassung von Balanceeinschrankungen in dieser Personengruppe. Allerdings existiert fur die CBM bislang keine deutschsprachige Version.ZielZiel dieser Studie war 1.die standardisierte ubersetzung der CBM ins Deutsche (G-CBM) und deren interkulturelle Adaptation und 2.die uberprufung der Gutekriterien der G-CBM.Material und MethodenDie englischsprachige Original-CBM wurde gema ss internationalen Leitlinien ubersetzt. In die Studie wurden 51 altere Erwachsene (69,97,1Jahre) eingeschlossen. Die Konstruktvaliditat wurde anhand von Korrelationen mit etablierten Instrumenten zur Balance- und/oder Mobilitatsprufung, wie der Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 3m Tandemgang (3MTW), 8Level Balance Scale (8LBS), 30s-Aufstehtest (30CST), Timed up and Go (TUG) Test, Ganggeschwindigkeit und Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), bestimmt. Zudem wurden Intrarater- und Interrater-Reliabilitat (Intraklassenkorrelationskoeffizient, [ICC]) und interne Konsistenz (Cronbachs) untersucht. Deckeneffekte wurden als Prozentsatz der Probanden, die die maximale Punktzahl erreichten, berechnet. ErgebnisseDie G-CBM korrelierte hoch mit FAB und BBS (=0,78 bis 0,85; P<0,001), gut mit 3MTW, TUG, und FES-I (=-0,55 bis -0,61; P<0,001) sowie moderat mit 8LBS, 30CST und der Ganggeschwindigkeit (=0,32 bis 0,46; P<0,001). Die Intrarater- (ICC3,k=0,998; P<0,001) und Interrater-Reliabilitat (ICC2,k=0,996; P<0,001) sowie interne Konsistenz (=0,998) waren hoch. Die G-CBM zeigte keine Deckeneffekte.DiskussionDie G-CBM ist ein valides und reliables Instrument zur Messung leichter Balanceeinschrankungen bei alteren Erwachsenen in guter korperlicher Verfassung. Das Nichtvorhandensein von Deckeneffekten unterstreicht den Nutzen der Skala in dieser Gruppe. Die G-CBM ist nun fur den Einsatz im deutschsprachigen Raum verfugbar.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] German version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale: Translation and evaluation of measurement properties; [Deutschsprachige Version der Community Balance and Mobility Scale: Übersetzung und Evaluation der Gütekriterien]
    Gordt K.
    Mikolaizak A.S.
    Nerz C.
    Barz C.
    Gerhardy T.
    Weber M.
    Becker C.
    Schwenk M.
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019, 52 (1) : 28 - 36
  • [2] Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale in ambulatory, community-dwelling, elderly people
    Elboim-Gabyzon, Michal
    Agmon, Maayan
    Azaiza, Faisal
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2019, 14 : 1075 - 1083
  • [3] Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness of the Original and the Shortened Version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale for Young Seniors
    Gordt, Katharina
    Nerz, Corinna
    Mikolaizak, A. Stefanie
    Taraldsen, Kristin
    Pijnappels, Mirjam
    Helbostad, Jorunn L.
    Vereijken, Beatrix
    Becker, Clemens
    Schwenk, Michael
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 102 (11): : 2102 - 2108
  • [4] Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease (SEMCD) scale: translation and evaluation of measurement properties for a swedish version
    Melin, Jeanette
    Fors, Andreas
    Jakobsson, Sofie
    Krabbe, David
    Bjorkman, Ida
    ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 81 (01)
  • [5] Balance Evaluation Systems Test: German translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary results on psychometric properties
    Haselwander, Maren
    Henes, Yannick
    Weisbrod, Matthias
    Diermayr, Gudrun
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2023, 56 (02): : 125 - 131
  • [6] Assessment of balance in community dwelling older adults. Reliability and validity of the German version of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale
    Schott, N.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2011, 44 (06): : 417 - 428
  • [7] The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&M-T) in Older Adults
    Arslan, Saniye Aydogan
    Sertel, Meral
    Demirci, Cevher Savcun
    Erdal, Elif Sakizli
    Muci, Birsen
    JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 4 (03): : 324 - 328
  • [8] Concurrent validity and reliability of the Community Balance and Mobility scale in young-older adults
    Weber, Michaela
    Van Ancum, Jeanine
    Bergquist, Ronny
    Taraldsen, Kristin
    Gordt, Katharina
    Mikolaizak, A. Stefanie
    Nerz, Corinna
    Pijnappels, Mirjam
    Jonkman, Nini H.
    Maier, Andrea B.
    Helbostad, Jorunn L.
    Vereijken, Beatrix
    Becker, Clemens
    Schwenk, Michael
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2018, 18
  • [9] Berg-Balance-Scale - German Version - Translation of a Standardized Instrument for the Assessment of Balance and Risk of Falling
    Scherfer, E.
    Bohls, C.
    Freiberger, E.
    Heise, K. -F.
    Hogan, D.
    PHYSIOSCIENCE, 2006, 2 (02) : 59 - 66
  • [10] Validity of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale in Community-Dwelling Persons After Stroke
    Knorr, Svetlana
    Brouwer, Brenda
    Garland, Jayne
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 91 (06): : 890 - 896