The Telemark Breast Score: A Reliable Method for the Evaluation of Results after Breast Surgery

被引:8
作者
Begic, Anadi [1 ]
Stark, Birgit
机构
[1] Telemark Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, N-3724 Skien, Norway
关键词
DIMENSIONS ANALYSIS; MEASURING OUTCOMES; AESTHETIC SURGERY; RELIABILITY; RECONSTRUCTION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000002487
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Validated instruments for assessing results after breast surgery are sparse. The authors present here a method used for the past 10 years at their institution for evaluation of outcome after breast-conserving surgery and microsurgical breast reconstruction. Methods: The Telemark Breast Score is a method based on standard two-dimensional photographs assessing the outcome after breast surgery in terms of volume, shape, and symmetry. Three panels comprising two plastic surgeons, two breast surgeons, and two nurses tested the Telemark Breast Score on 346 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery for cancer and 31 other patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction. All patients were assessed at least 1 year after their operation. Consistency of agreement between and within the panels was studied. Results: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was good after consensus discussion. Good rating stability was shown using test-retest measurements. Conclusion: The Telemark Breast Score is an inexpensive, statistically reliable method and can be applied for quality control after breast surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:390E / 400E
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Measuring Outcomes in Aesthetic Surgery [J].
Alderman, Amy ;
Chung, Kevin C. .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 40 (02) :297-+
[2]   The need for a standardised anthropometric protocol for objective assessment of pre- and postoperative breast surgery [J].
Brown, Nicola ;
Scurr, Joanna .
GLAND SURGERY, 2012, 1 (03) :142-145
[3]   Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: A comprehensive review of the literature [J].
Ching, S ;
Thoma, A ;
McCabe, RE ;
Antony, MM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (01) :469-480
[4]   Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction [J].
Clough, KB ;
O'Donoghue, JM ;
Fitoussi, AD ;
Nos, C ;
Falcou, MC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (07) :1702-1709
[5]   Photographic standards in plastic surgery [J].
DiBernardo, BE ;
Adams, RL ;
Krause, J ;
Fiorillo, MA ;
Gheradini, G .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (02) :559-568
[6]   Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery [J].
Galdino, GM ;
Nahabedian, M ;
Chiaramonte, M ;
Geng, JZ ;
Klatsky, S ;
Manson, P .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 110 (01) :58-70
[7]   The Three Breast Dimensions: Analysis and Effecting Change [J].
Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (06) :1632-1642
[8]   Assessment of Breast Aesthetics [J].
Kim, Min Soon ;
Sbalchiero, Juliano C. ;
Reece, Gregory P. ;
Miller, Michael J. ;
Beahm, Elisabeth K. ;
Markey, Mia K. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (04) :186E-194E
[9]   Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast [J].
Losken, A ;
Seify, H ;
Denson, DD ;
Paredes, AA ;
Carlson, GW .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 54 (05) :471-476
[10]   Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: An analysis of reliability [J].
Lowery, JC ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Kuzon, WM ;
Davis, JA .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1996, 36 (06) :601-606