Broad strokes towards a grand theory in the analysis of sustainable development: a return to the classical political economy

被引:127
作者
Manioudis, Manolis [1 ]
Meramveliotakis, Giorgos [1 ]
机构
[1] Neapolis Univ Pafos, Dept Econ & Business, Pafos, Cyprus
关键词
Sustainable development; grand theory; stage theory; political economy; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1080/13563467.2022.2038114
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article aims to provide some broad strokes towards an analytical and methodological framework for the analysis of sustainable development. This is done by calling sustainable development's scholars to return to the multilayered legacy of the classical political economy and conceive sustainable development in both historical and transhistorical terms. It is argued that a return to the tradition of the classical political economy, through the lens of Smith's, Mill's and Marx's stage theories of development, provides a powerful theoretical framework able to contextualise, develop and integrate the multiple, diverse, and middle-range contemporary strands in development studies. The classical political economy provides an analytical backbone of certain elements, including the important role of history, the necessity of an interdisciplinary approach, and the analytical priority of social classes that could be critical in enriching sustainable development studies. Students and scholars of international development would benefit from this worthwhile exercise that distinguishes in a succinctly and methodically manner between the current state of development studies and classical political economy perspectives on economic development.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 878
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]  
Hodgson GeoffreyM., 2001, EC FORGOT HIST
[22]   A new conceptual framework for sustainable development [J].
Jabareen Y. .
Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2008, 10 (2) :179-192
[23]   Adam Smith's theory of economic history and economic development [J].
Kim, Kwangsu .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT, 2009, 16 (01) :41-64
[24]   Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU) [J].
Kirchherr, Julian ;
Piscicelli, Laura ;
Bour, Ruben ;
Kostense-Smit, Erica ;
Muller, Jennifer ;
Huibrechtse-Truijens, Anne ;
Hekkert, Marko .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 150 :264-272
[25]   Circular economy as an essentially contested concept [J].
Korhonen, Jouni ;
Nuur, Cali ;
Feldmann, Andreas ;
Birkie, Seyoum Eshetu .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 :544-552
[26]   Beyond the Stereotype: Restating the Relevance of the Dependency Research Programme [J].
Kvangraven, Ingrid Harvold .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2021, 52 (01) :76-112
[27]   Interdisciplinarity in Sustainability Studies: A Review [J].
Lam, Jacqueline C. K. ;
Walker, Richard M. ;
Hills, Peter .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 22 (03) :158-176
[28]   An Early Anticipation of Smart Growth? John Stuart Mill, Knowledge and the 'East-West' Distinction [J].
Manioudis, Manolis .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2022, 13 (03) :2164-2176
[29]   Smith'sWealth of Nationsand the economic past: setting the scene for economic history? [J].
Manioudis, Manolis ;
Milonakis, Dimitris .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT, 2021, 28 (01) :142-163
[30]  
Marx Karl., 1979, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy