Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review

被引:14
|
作者
Ding, Yan [1 ]
Pulford, Justin [1 ]
Bates, Imelda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool Liverpool Sch Trop Med, Ctr Capac Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2020年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; TEAM SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; INTEGRATION; CHALLENGES; KNOWLEDGE; REFLECTIONS; EXPERIENCES; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002293
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Global health research involves disciplines within and beyond the health sciences. A cross-disciplinary collaborative research approach enables an interchange of knowledge and experience and stimulates innovative responses to complex health challenges. However, there is little robust evidence to guide the design and implementation of cross-disciplinary research in global health, hampering effective collective action. This review synthesised evidence on practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary research to provide guidance on the design and implementation of research in global health. Methods We searched five electronic databases using key words. The search included original research and research notes articles in English. We used a framework adapted from the socio-ecological model and thematic synthesis for data analysis. Results Thirty-six original research and 27 research notes articles were included in the review. These were predominantly from high-income countries and indicated that practical actions on fostering cross-disciplinary research are closely linked to leadership and teamwork which should be planned and implemented at research team and institutional levels. The publications also indicated that individual qualities such as being receptive to new ideas and funders' power and influence have practical implications for conducting cross-disciplinary research. Practical actions that individuals, research team leaders, academic institutions and funders can undertake to foster cross-disciplinary research were identified. Conclusion Our review found evidence from high-income countries, not low-and-middle-income countries, about practices that can improve cross-disciplinary research in global health. Critical knowledge gaps exist around how leadership and teamwork processes can better integrate expertise from different disciplines to make cross-disciplinary research more effective.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] Text network analysis of research topics and trends on global health nursing literature from 1974-2017
    Lee, Soo-Kyoung
    Hong, Hye Sun
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (03) : 1325 - 1334
  • [32] Community voice in cross-sector alignment: concepts and strategies from a scoping review of the health collaboration literature
    Petiwala, Aliza
    Lanford, Daniel
    Landers, Glenn
    Minyard, Karen
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [33] Community voice in cross-sector alignment: concepts and strategies from a scoping review of the health collaboration literature
    Aliza Petiwala
    Daniel Lanford
    Glenn Landers
    Karen Minyard
    BMC Public Health, 21
  • [34] Building a Global Health Education Network for Clinical Care and Research. The Benefits and Challenges of Distance Learning Tools. Lessons Learned from the Hopkins Center for Clinical Global Health Education
    Bollinger, Robert C.
    McKenzie-White, Jane
    Gupta, Amita
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 25 (02) : 385 - +
  • [35] Identification of domestic violence by health care professionals: barriers and facilitators to its recognition and recommendations from research - a review of literature
    Wieczorek, Lukasz
    Dabrowska, Katarzyna
    Lukowska, Katarzyna
    ALKOHOLIZM I NARKOMANIA-ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ADDICTION, 2024, 37 (01): : 43 - 66
  • [36] What constitutes equitable data sharing in global health research? A scoping review of the literature on low-income and middle-income country stakeholders' perspectives
    Evertsz, Natalia
    Bull, Susan
    Pratt, Bridget
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 8 (03):
  • [37] Strategies and Lessons Learned During Cleaning of Data From Research Panel Participants: Cross-sectional Web-Based Health Behavior Survey Study
    Arevalo, Mariana
    Brownstein, Naomi C.
    Whiting, Junmin
    Meade, Cathy D.
    Gwede, Clement K.
    Vadaparampil, Susan T.
    Tillery, Kristin J.
    Islam, Jessica Y.
    Giuliano, Anna R.
    Christy, Shannon M.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (06)
  • [38] Why urban communities from low-income and middle-income countries participate in public and global health research: protocol for a scoping review
    Gagnon-Dufresne, Marie-Catherine
    Sarmiento, Ivan
    Fortin, Genevieve
    Andersson, Neil
    Zinszer, Kate
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [39] Health research mentorship in low-income and middle-income countries: a global qualitative evidence synthesis of data from a crowdsourcing open call and scoping review
    Kpokiri, Eneyi E.
    Mcdonald, Kamryn
    Abraha, Yoseph Gebreyohannes
    Osorio, Lyda
    Nath, Tilak Chandra
    Talavera-Urdanivia, Victor A.
    Akinwale, Olaoluwa Pheabian
    Manabe, Yukari Carol
    Castelnuovo, Barbara
    Tang, Weiming
    Yilma, Daniel
    Mihut, Michael
    Ezechi, Oliver
    Iwelunmor, Juliet
    Kaba, Mirgissa
    Abdissa, Alemseged
    Tucker, Joseph D.
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2024, 9 (01):