Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review

被引:14
|
作者
Ding, Yan [1 ]
Pulford, Justin [1 ]
Bates, Imelda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool Liverpool Sch Trop Med, Ctr Capac Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2020年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; TEAM SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; INTEGRATION; CHALLENGES; KNOWLEDGE; REFLECTIONS; EXPERIENCES; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002293
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Global health research involves disciplines within and beyond the health sciences. A cross-disciplinary collaborative research approach enables an interchange of knowledge and experience and stimulates innovative responses to complex health challenges. However, there is little robust evidence to guide the design and implementation of cross-disciplinary research in global health, hampering effective collective action. This review synthesised evidence on practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary research to provide guidance on the design and implementation of research in global health. Methods We searched five electronic databases using key words. The search included original research and research notes articles in English. We used a framework adapted from the socio-ecological model and thematic synthesis for data analysis. Results Thirty-six original research and 27 research notes articles were included in the review. These were predominantly from high-income countries and indicated that practical actions on fostering cross-disciplinary research are closely linked to leadership and teamwork which should be planned and implemented at research team and institutional levels. The publications also indicated that individual qualities such as being receptive to new ideas and funders' power and influence have practical implications for conducting cross-disciplinary research. Practical actions that individuals, research team leaders, academic institutions and funders can undertake to foster cross-disciplinary research were identified. Conclusion Our review found evidence from high-income countries, not low-and-middle-income countries, about practices that can improve cross-disciplinary research in global health. Critical knowledge gaps exist around how leadership and teamwork processes can better integrate expertise from different disciplines to make cross-disciplinary research more effective.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Defining global health: findings from a systematic review and thematic analysis of the literature
    Salm, Melissa
    Ali, Mahima
    Minihane, Mairead
    Conrad, Patricia
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (06):
  • [22] Active and direct patient participation in health professions education: A narrative overview of literature from the global south
    Jawwad, Ayesha
    Zaidi, Zareen
    Ramani, Subha
    Popeijus, Herman E.
    Govaerts, Marjan
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2025, 135
  • [23] The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
    Byrne, E.
    Donaldson, L.
    Manda-Taylor, L.
    Brugha, R.
    Matthews, A.
    MacDonald, S.
    Mwapasa, V.
    Petersen, M.
    Walsh, A.
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2016, 12
  • [24] Meanings and mechanisms of One Health partnerships: insights from a critical review of literature on cross-government collaborations
    Abbas, Syed Shahid
    Shorten, Tim
    Rushton, Jonathan
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2022, 37 (03) : 385 - 399
  • [25] Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: a narrative review
    Hove, Jennifer
    D'Ambruoso, Lucia
    Kahn, Kathleen
    Witter, Sophie
    van der Merwe, Maria
    Mabetha, Denny
    Tembo, Kingsley
    Twine, Rhian
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [26] A narrative review of health research capacity strengthening in low and middle-income countries: lessons for conflict-affected areas
    Bowsher, Gemma
    Papamichail, Andreas
    El Achi, Nassim
    Ekzayez, Abdulkarim
    Roberts, Bayard
    Sullivan, Richard
    Patel, Preeti
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2019, 15 (1)
  • [27] Cohesion Between Research Literature and Health System Level Efforts to Address Global Neurosurgical Inequity: A Scoping Review
    Ham, Edward I.
    Kim, Jeongyoon
    Kanmounye, Ulrick Sidney
    Lartigue, Jean Wilguens
    Gupta, Saksham
    Esene, Ignatius N.
    Park, Kee B.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 143 : E88 - E105
  • [28] Dentistry, e-health and digitalisation: A critical narrative review of the dental literature on digital technologies with insights from health and technology studies
    Neville, Patricia
    van der Zande, Marieke M.
    COMMUNITY DENTAL HEALTH, 2020, 37 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [29] Mapping maternal and infant health in Morocco: A global scoping review of themes, gaps, and the "unseen" in the published health research literature, 2000-2022
    Amster, Ellen
    Jessani, Ghazal
    Gupta, Gauri
    Hlyva, Oksana
    Rae, Charlene
    PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 4 (07):
  • [30] Overcoming structural barriers to sharing power with communities in global health research priority-setting: Lessons from the Participation for Local Action project in Karnataka, India
    Pratt, Bridget
    Seshadri, Tanya
    Srinivas, Prashanth N.
    GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 17 (12) : 3334 - 3352