A survey of French gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes toward conservative treatment for fertility preservation in young patients with endometrial cancer

被引:1
作者
Peigne, Maeliss [1 ]
Maumy, Louise [1 ]
Koskas, Martin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, AP HP, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, F-75018 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Paris, France
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Endometrial atypical hyperplasia; Fertility preservation; Fertility sparing; Attitude; Knowledge; SPARING-MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES; WOMEN; ADENOCARCINOMA; BARRIERS; ONCOLOGISTS; HYPERPLASIA; PROGESTIN; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101794
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe knowledge and attitudes toward fertility preservation (FP) in patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma (EC/AH) among French gynecologists Materials and Methods: A national survey among French gynaecologists: one questionnaire with one common part and two specific parts for gynecological surgeon (GS) or for specialists in reproductive medicine (SRM) was sent from April 2017 to April 2018. Knowledge and attitudes toward FP in EC/AH were evaluated with a "knowledge score" and an "attitudes score" using a four- or five-point Likert scale. Results: One hundred forty physicians completed the survey (87 GS, 53 SRM). The knowledge score was low (59.3% medium/low), but it was significantly higher for GS compared to SRM. The better-known treatments were oral progestins and hysteroscopic resection. Among the participants treating EC/AH, 52.6% found it "difficult" to manage patients and 61.8% regretted the lack of official recommendations. Most physicians seemed to be uncomfortable/unsupportive with FP in EC/AH (57.2% "attitude score' below 11/20). There was a positive correlation between knowledge and attitude scores. GS "usually/always" give advice to patients about FP before EC/AH treatment. After maximum 3-6 months, 56.6% of SRM chose In Vitro Fecundation (IVF) to reduce time-to-pregnancy, with GnRH antagonist protocols (28%) or mild-stimulation (15.1%) to avoid hyperoestrogenism. Conclusions: Despite reassuring results in the literature, French gynecologists are uncomfortable with FP using EC/AH conservative management, which may be because of a lack of confidence in their knowledge. Specific guidelines are needed to help physicians manage these young patients and their fertility. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring Morphologic and Molecular Aspects of Endometrial Cancer Under Progesterone Treatment in the Context of Fertility Preservation
    van Gent, Mignon D. J. M.
    Nicolae-Cristea, Alina R.
    de Kroon, Cor D.
    Osse, Elisabeth M.
    Kagie, Marjolein J.
    Trimbos, J. Baptist M. Z.
    Hazelbag, Hans Marten
    Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M.
    Bosse, Tjalling
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (03) : 483 - 490
  • [22] Counseling patients on reproductive aging and elective fertility preservation—a survey of obstetricians and gynecologists’ experience, approach, and knowledge
    Rani Fritz
    Susan Klugman
    Harry Lieman
    Jay Schulkin
    Laura Taouk
    Neko Castleberry
    Erkan Buyuk
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 1613 - 1621
  • [23] Potential of molecular classification to guide fertility-sparing management among young patients with endometrial cancer
    Agusti, Nuria
    Kanbergs, Alexa
    Nitecki, Roni
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 185 : 121 - 127
  • [24] Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Review of the Literature
    Leone Roberti Maggiore, Umberto
    Khamisy-Farah, Rola
    Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Lopez, Salvatore
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Ditto, Antonino
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (20)
  • [25] Young patients with endometrial cancer: How many could be eligible for fertility-sparing treatment?
    Navarria, Isabelle
    Usel, Massimo
    Rapiti, Elisabetta
    Neyroud-Caspar, Isabelle
    Pelte, Marie-Francoise
    Bouchardy, Christine
    Petignat, Patrick
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (03) : 448 - 451
  • [26] Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists’ current knowledge, practice and attitudes
    E Adams
    E Hill
    E Watson
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108 : 1602 - 1615
  • [27] Otorhinolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding fertility preservation in young cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: an anonymous questionnaire survey
    Naoki Akisada
    Nobuya Monden
    Takehito Kishino
    Jiro Aoi
    Yuji Hayashi
    Saori Takahashi
    Masataka Nakamura
    Hisashi Ishihara
    Kazunori Nishizaki
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021, 26 : 1196 - 1202
  • [28] Parental Attitudes Toward Fertility Preservation in Female Adolescent Cancer Patients in Lebanon
    Khalife, Dalia
    Kutteh, William
    Tarhini, Hawraa
    Khalil, Ali
    Beyrouthy, Christine
    Ghazeeri, Ghina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 32 (05) : 525 - 529
  • [29] PTEN mutation predicts unfavorable fertility preserving treatment outcome in the young patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia
    Xue, Yu
    Dong, Youting
    Lou, Yaochen
    Lv, Qiaoying
    Shan, Weiwei
    Wang, Chao
    Chen, Xiaojun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 (04)
  • [30] European Society of Gynecological Oncology Task Force for Fertility Preservation Clinical Recommendations for Fertility-Sparing Management in Young Endometrial Cancer Patients
    Rodolakis, Alexandros
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    Morice, Philippe
    Reed, Nick
    Mangler, Mandy
    Kesic, Vesna
    Denschlag, Dominik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (07) : 1258 - 1265