Comparison of pegfilgrastim on day 2 vs. day 4 as primary prophylaxis of intense dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with node-positive primary breast cancer within the prospective, multi-center GAIN study: (GBG 33)

被引:24
作者
Loibl, Sibylle [1 ]
Mueller, Volkmar [2 ]
von Minckwitz, Gunter [1 ]
Conrad, Bettina [3 ]
Koehne, Claus-Henning [4 ]
Kremers, Stephan [5 ]
Forstbauer, Helmut [6 ]
Linder, Mattea [1 ]
Nekljudova, Valentina [1 ]
Moebus, Volker [7 ]
机构
[1] German Breast Grp, D-63263 Neu Isenburg, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Elisabeth Hosp, Kassel, Germany
[4] Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
[5] Caritas Krankenhaus Lebach, Lebach, Germany
[6] GOSPL Gesell Onkol Studien Hamatol & Onkol, Troisdorf, Germany
[7] Stadt Kliniken Frankfurt Hochst, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Pegfilgrastim; Neutropenia; Primary breast cancer; Dose-dense chemotherapy; Leucopenia; Febrile; SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DAILY FILGRASTIM; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-010-1020-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Preliminary data suggest that pegfilgrastim given on day 4 (P4) might be superior to pegfilgrastim on day 2 (P2) in reducing grade 4 leucopenia. Patients with node-positive primary breast cancer receiving epirubicin-paclitaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy were randomized to receive P2 versus P4. Primary endpoint was leucopenia grade 4, assuming a risk reduction of 50% with P4 from 50% in P2 to 25% with P4. Three-hundred fifty-one patients were randomized to P2 (n = 174) versus P4 (n = 177). The rate of leucopenia (grade 4) was 47.1% with P2 and 42.0% with P4 (p = 0.387), neutropenia (grade 3 + 4) was 47.9% versus 40.8% (p = 0.337), FN was 4.7% versus 8.0% (p = 0.271), and infections was 29.9% versus 25.4% (p = 0.404), respectively. This study failed to demonstrate that pegfilgrastim on day 4 was more efficacious than on day 2 with respect to grade 4 leucopenia (the primary endpoint), febrile neutropenia, or infections.
引用
收藏
页码:1789 / 1795
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours
    Aapro, M. S.
    Cameron, D. A.
    Pettengell, R.
    Bohlius, J.
    Crawford, J.
    Ellis, M.
    Kearney, N.
    Lyman, G. H.
    Tjan-Heijnen, V. C.
    Walewski, J.
    Weber, D. C.
    Zielinski, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (15) : 2433 - 2453
  • [2] Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
    Aapro, Matti
    Schwenkglenks, Matthias
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Lopez Pousa, Antonio
    Lawrinson, Susan
    Skacel, Tomas
    Bacon, Pamela
    von Minckwitz, Gunter
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2010, 74 (03) : 203 - 210
  • [3] *AMG, 2008, NEUL PEGF PRESCR INF
  • [4] Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: First report of intergroup trial C9741/cancer and leukemia group B trial 9741
    Citron, ML
    Berry, DA
    Cirrincione, C
    Hudis, C
    Winer, EP
    Gradishar, WJ
    Davidson, NE
    Martino, S
    Livingston, R
    Ingle, JN
    Perez, EA
    Carpenter, J
    Hurd, D
    Holland, JF
    Smith, BL
    Sartor, CI
    Leung, EH
    Abrams, J
    Schilsky, RL
    Muss, HB
    Norton, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (08) : 1431 - 1439
  • [5] Randomized Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pegfilgrastim versus Filgrastim after Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy in Young Adults and Children with Sarcomas
    Fox, Elizabeth
    Widemann, Brigitte C.
    Hawkins, Douglas S.
    Jayaprakash, Nalini
    Dagher, Ramzi
    Aikin, Alberta A.
    Bernstein, Donna
    Long, Lauren
    Mackall, Crystal
    Helman, Lee
    Steinberg, Seth M.
    Balis, Frank M.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (23) : 7361 - 7367
  • [6] A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Green, MD
    Koelbl, H
    Baselga, J
    Galid, A
    Guillem, V
    Gascon, P
    Siena, S
    Lalisang, RI
    Samonigg, H
    Clemens, MR
    Zani, V
    Liang, BC
    Renwick, J
    Piccart, MJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [7] Hartmann F, 2007, J CLIN ONCOL, V25
  • [8] Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer
    Holmes, FA
    O'Shaughnessy, JA
    Vukelja, S
    Jones, SE
    Shogan, J
    Savin, M
    Glaspy, J
    Moore, M
    Meza, L
    Wiznitzer, I
    Neumann, TA
    Hill, LR
    Liang, BC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) : 727 - 731
  • [9] Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy
    Johnston, E
    Crawford, J
    Blackwell, S
    Bjurstrom, T
    Lockbaum, P
    Roskos, L
    Yang, BB
    Gardner, S
    Miller-Messana, MA
    Shoemaker, D
    Garst, J
    Schwab, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (13) : 2522 - 2528
  • [10] Loibl S, 2009, J CLIN ONCOL, V27