Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for predicting production capability of crop yield

被引:4
|
作者
Jain, Kalpana [1 ]
Choudhary, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll Technol & Engn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Crop management; Crop yield prediction; Machine learning; Classification; Data mining;
D O I
10.1007/s13198-021-01543-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Recently, the applicability of information technology for quality productivity in agriculture has been increasing progressively. As a result of these, there has been a significant increase in the data obtained from agricultural production. The data obtained from experimental research helps in the decision-making process through machine learning and artificial intelligence. Applications of data mining steps make raw agricultural data more meaningful. Data mining analysis used in many fields brings a variety of benefits to its use in agricultural production. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the application of information technology in agriculture associated with crop management, such as yield prediction, water management, and climate factors based on recent research. Furthermore, this paper presents a soil-based Machine learning comparative analytical framework (SMLF) to predict crop yield production. Evaluates the influence of soil characteristics and climate factors to identify the crop yield prediction class label (High, Low, Medium). Simultaneously this framework presents a comparative analysis of the benchmark classifier to trained and labels the corpus of crop data set for High, low, medium yield prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 593
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting Car Rental Prices: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models
    Yang, Jiseok
    Kim, Jinseok
    Ryu, Hanwoong
    Lee, Jiwoon
    Park, Cheolsoo
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (12)
  • [22] An Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Crop Prediction
    Mariammal, G.
    Suruliandi, A.
    Raja, S. P.
    Poongothai, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 8 (04): : 96 - 104
  • [23] Development of multistage crop yield estimation model using machine learning and deep learning techniques
    Aravind, K. S.
    Vashisth, Ananta
    Krishnan, P.
    Kundu, Monika
    Prasad, Shiv
    Meena, M. C.
    Lama, Achal
    Das, Pankaj
    Das, Bappa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2025, 69 (02) : 499 - 515
  • [24] Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques in predicting dielectric behavior of ternary chalcogenide thin films
    Mohamed, R. A.
    Atyia, H. E.
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2024, 99 (12)
  • [25] Predicting Diabetes Mellitus With Machine Learning Techniques
    Zou, Quan
    Qu, Kaiyang
    Luo, Yamei
    Yin, Dehui
    Ju, Ying
    Tang, Hua
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2018, 9
  • [26] Predicting copper concentrations in acid mine drainage: a comparative analysis of five machine learning techniques
    Betrie, Getnet D.
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    Morin, Kevin A.
    Sadiq, Rehan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2013, 185 (05) : 4171 - 4182
  • [27] Predicting copper concentrations in acid mine drainage: a comparative analysis of five machine learning techniques
    Getnet D. Betrie
    Solomon Tesfamariam
    Kevin A. Morin
    Rehan Sadiq
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2013, 185 : 4171 - 4182
  • [28] Prediction of Breast Cancer, Comparative Review of Machine Learning Techniques, and Their Analysis
    Fatima, Noreen
    Liu, Li
    Hong, Sha
    Ahmed, Haroon
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 150360 - 150376
  • [29] Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for Parkinson’s detection: A review
    Khanna K.
    Gambhir S.
    Gambhir M.
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2023, 82 (29) : 45205 - 45231
  • [30] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Temperature Compensation in Microwave Sensors
    Kazemi, Nazli
    Abdolrazzaghi, Mohammad
    Musilek, Petr
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2021, 69 (09) : 4223 - 4236