In-hospital prescription changes and documentation in the medical records of the primary care provider: results from a medical record review study

被引:5
|
作者
Poldervaart, Judith M. [1 ]
van Melle, Marije A. [1 ]
Willemse, Sanne [2 ]
de Wit, Niek J. [1 ]
Zwart, Dorien L. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary care, Str 6 101,POB| 85500, NL-3508AB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Prescription changes; Continuity of care; Transitional care; Patient safety; Primary care; Secondary care; Medical record; HEALTH-CARE; COMMUNICATION; ASSOCIATION; INFORMATION; PHYSICIANS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-017-2738-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: An increasing number of transitions due to substitution of care of more complex patients urges insight in and improvement of transitional medication safety. While lack of documentation of prescription changes and/or lack of information exchange between settings likely cause adverse drug events, frequency of occurrence of these causes is not clear. Therefore, we aimed at determining the frequency of in-hospital patients' prescription changes that are not or incorrectly documented in their primary care provider's (PCP) medical record. Methods: A medical record review study was performed in a database linking patients' medical records of hospital and PCP. A random sample (n = 600) was drawn from all 1399 patients who were registered at a participating primary care practice as well as the gastroenterology or cardiology department in 2013 of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. Outcomes were the number of in-hospital prescription changes that was not or incorrectly documented in the medical record of the PCP, and timeliness of documentation. Results: Records of 390 patients included one or more primary-secondary care transitions; in total we identified 1511 transitions. During these transitions, 408 in-hospital prescription changes were made, of which 31% was not or incorrectly documented in the medical record of the PCP within the next 3 months. In case changes were documented, the median number of days between hospital visit and documentation was 3 (IQR 0-18). Conclusions: One third of in-hospital prescription changes was not or incorrectly documented in the PCP's record, which likely puts patients at risk of adverse drug events after hospital visits. Such flawed reliability of a routine care process is unacceptable and warrants improvement and close monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In-hospital prescription changes and documentation in the medical records of the primary care provider: results from a medical record review study
    Judith M. Poldervaart
    Marije A. van Melle
    Sanne Willemse
    Niek J. de Wit
    Dorien L.M. Zwart
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [2] Electronic Medical Records Are Not Associated With Improved Documentation in Community Primary Care Practices
    Hahn, Karissa A.
    Ohman-Strickland, Pamela A.
    Cohen, Deborah J.
    Piasecki, Alicja K.
    Crosson, Jesse C.
    Clark, Elizabeth C.
    Crabtree, Benjamin F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2011, 26 (04) : 272 - 277
  • [3] The prevalence of obesity documentation in Primary Care Electronic Medical Records Are we acknowledging the problem?
    Mattar, Ahmed
    Carlston, David
    Sariol, Glen
    Yu, Tongle
    Almustafa, Ahmad
    Melton, Genevieve B.
    Ahmed, Adil
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 8 (01): : 67 - 79
  • [4] We Need to Talk: Primary Care Provider Communication at Discharge in the Era of a Shared Electronic Medical Record
    Sheu, Leslie
    Fung, Kelly
    Mourad, Michelle
    Ranji, Sumant
    Wu, Ethel
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (05) : 307 - 310
  • [5] The Management of Test Results in Primary Care: Does an Electronic Medical Record Make a Difference?
    Elder, Nancy C.
    McEwen, Timothy R.
    Flach, John
    Gallimore, Jennie
    Pallerla, Harini
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (05) : 327 - 333
  • [6] Medical Specialists' Perspectives on the Influence of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Quality of Hospital Care: Semistructured Interview Study
    van Poelgeest, Rube
    Schrijvers, Augustinus
    Boonstra, Albert
    Roes, Kit
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2021, 8 (04):
  • [7] Effects of intensive care unit quality assessment on changes in medical staff in medical institutions and in-hospital mortality
    Kim, Seungju
    Kim, Gui Ok
    Lee, Syalrom
    Kwon, Yong Uk
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [8] Advance care planning in primary care: a retrospective medical record study among patients with different illness trajectories
    Bekker, Yvonne A. C.
    Suntjens, Ankie F.
    Engels, Y.
    Schers, H.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Groenewoud, A. Stef
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [9] Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review
    McBrien, Kerry A.
    Souri, Sepideh
    Symonds, Nicola E.
    Rouhi, Azin
    Lethebe, Brendan C.
    Williamson, Tyler S.
    Garies, Stephanie
    Birtwhistle, Richard
    Quan, Hude
    Fabreau, Gabriel E.
    Ronksley, Paul E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (11) : 1567 - 1578
  • [10] Validity and reliability of a medical record review method identifying transitional patient safety incidents in merged primary and secondary care patients' records
    van Melle, Marije A.
    Zwart, Dorien L. M.
    Poldervaart, Judith M.
    Verkerk, Otto Jan
    Langelaan, Maaike
    van Stel, Henk F.
    de Wit, Niek J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (08):