Outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy

被引:13
作者
Schulster, Michael L. [1 ]
Sidhom, Daniel A. [1 ]
Sturgeon, Kathryn [1 ]
Borin, James F. [1 ]
Bjurlin, Marc A. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Urol, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, 101 Manning Dr 2nd Floor, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
关键词
Robotic pyelolithotomy; Kidney stones; Nephrolithiasis; Complications; Outcomes; CLINICAL-RESEARCH OFFICE; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOLITHOTOMY; RENAL STONES; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; CM; SURGERY; CALCULI; SAFETY; PYELOPLASTY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-019-01004-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Standard of care for large or complex renal stones is percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Robotic pyelolithotomy, however, may be a feasible alternative, but limited data exist on its outcomes and complications. Our study objective was to describe the outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy for complex renal calculi. We performed a retrospective analysis of robotic pyelolithotomy at our tertiary academic institution from 2015 to 2018. Demographics, stone clearance rates, complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of stay were reported. 15 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (SD 15.3, 27-80) and BMI 25 kg/m(2) (SD 4.6, 20.9-35.7). Median follow-up was 4 months. Median stone size was 3 cm (SD 1.2 cm, 2-5 cm). Concomitant pyeloplasty was performed in 2 patients, complete stone clearance in 11 (73%) cases and 4 out of 5 (80%) with a solitary stone. Median operative time was 191.5 min (SD 64.8 min, 110-303 min), with no open conversion. Median EBL was 70 ml (SD 65 ml, 20-250 ml) and median length of stay was 1 day (SD 1 day, 1-5 days). Median change in creatinine and eGFR were - 0.02 mg/dl and + 3 ml/min/1.73 m(2). There were no cases of sepsis or post-operative fever and only one case of transfusion. Robotic pyelolithotomy appears safe and effective. Ultimately, less bleeding, lower septicemia, renal parenchymal preservation, and favorable stone-free rates in a single procedure make this as an attractive option in the management of select patients with large renal stone disease.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 407
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [31] EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis
    Tuerk, Christian
    Petrik, Ales
    Sarica, Kemal
    Seitz, Christian
    Skolarikos, Andreas
    Straub, Michael
    Knoll, Thomas
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 475 - 482
  • [32] Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Compared to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy as Surgical Management for Large Renal Pelvic Calculi: A Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Xinghuan
    Li, Sheng
    Liu, Tongzu
    Guo, Yi
    Yang, Zhonghua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (03) : 888 - 893
  • [33] Management of Single Large Nonstaghorn Renal Stones in the CROES PCNL Global Study
    Xue, Wei
    Pacik, Dalibor
    Boellaard, Willem
    Breda, Alberto
    Botoca, Mircea
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
    de la Rosette, Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04) : 1293 - 1297