Supporting solar power in renewables portfolio standards: Experience from the United States

被引:69
作者
Wiser, Ryan [1 ]
Barbose, Galen [1 ]
Holt, Edward [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Elect Markets & Policy Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Ed Holt & Associates Inc, Harpswell, ME 04079 USA
关键词
Renewables portfolio standards; Solar; Resource diversity; TRADABLE GREEN CERTIFICATES; ENERGY; POLICY; FEED; MARKETS; PERSPECTIVE; COMPETITION; OBLIGATION; EFFICIENCY; GERMANY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Renewables portfolio standards (RPS) have become an increasingly popular option for encouraging the deployment of renewable electricity. It is a relatively new policy mechanism, however, and experience with its use is only beginning to emerge. One key concern is whether RPS policies offer adequate support to a wide range of renewable energy technologies and applications or whether, alternatively, they will favor a small number of the currently least-cost forms of renewable energy. This article documents the design of and early experience with state-level RPS programs in the United States that have been specifically tailored to encourage a wider diversity of renewable energy technologies, and solar energy in particular. As shown here, state-level RPS programs specifically designed to support solar have already proven to be an important driver for solar energy deployment, and those impacts are projected to build in the coming years. State experience in supporting solar energy with RPS programs is mixed, however, and full compliance with existing requirements has not been achieved. The comparative experiences described herein highlight the opportunities and challenges of applying an RPS to specifically support solar energy, as well as the importance of policy design details to ensuring that program goals are achieved. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3894 / 3905
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]  
Michaels Robert., 2008, ELECT J, V21, P9, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2008.03.003
[22]   Feed in or certificates, competition or complementarity? Combining a static efficiency and a dynamic innovation perspective on the greening of the energy industry [J].
Midttun, Atle ;
Gautesen, Kristian .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) :1419-1422
[23]   Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany [J].
Mitchell, C ;
Bauknecht, D ;
Connor, PM .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (03) :297-305
[24]  
Nogee A., 2007, The Electricity Journal, V20, P33, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2007.04.001, 10.1016/j.tej.2007.04.001]
[25]   Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies [J].
Palmer, K ;
Burtraw, D .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (06) :873-894
[26]  
Rabe B.G., 2006, RACE TOP EXPANDING R
[27]  
Rader N., 1996, ELECT J, V9, P37, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80262-4
[28]   Fostering the use of renewable energies in the European Union: the race between feed-in tariffs and green certificates [J].
Ringel, M .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2006, 31 (01) :1-17
[29]  
SHERWOOD L, 2010, PERSONAL COMMUNICATI
[30]  
van der Linden N.H., 2005, REV INT EXPERIENCE R