Supporting solar power in renewables portfolio standards: Experience from the United States

被引:69
作者
Wiser, Ryan [1 ]
Barbose, Galen [1 ]
Holt, Edward [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Elect Markets & Policy Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Ed Holt & Associates Inc, Harpswell, ME 04079 USA
关键词
Renewables portfolio standards; Solar; Resource diversity; TRADABLE GREEN CERTIFICATES; ENERGY; POLICY; FEED; MARKETS; PERSPECTIVE; COMPETITION; OBLIGATION; EFFICIENCY; GERMANY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Renewables portfolio standards (RPS) have become an increasingly popular option for encouraging the deployment of renewable electricity. It is a relatively new policy mechanism, however, and experience with its use is only beginning to emerge. One key concern is whether RPS policies offer adequate support to a wide range of renewable energy technologies and applications or whether, alternatively, they will favor a small number of the currently least-cost forms of renewable energy. This article documents the design of and early experience with state-level RPS programs in the United States that have been specifically tailored to encourage a wider diversity of renewable energy technologies, and solar energy in particular. As shown here, state-level RPS programs specifically designed to support solar have already proven to be an important driver for solar energy deployment, and those impacts are projected to build in the coming years. State experience in supporting solar energy with RPS programs is mixed, however, and full compliance with existing requirements has not been achieved. The comparative experiences described herein highlight the opportunities and challenges of applying an RPS to specifically support solar energy, as well as the importance of policy design details to ensuring that program goals are achieved. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3894 / 3905
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[2]   Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003-2008 [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (03) :1255-1271
[3]   Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development [J].
Butler, Lucy ;
Neuhoff, Karsten .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (08) :1854-1867
[4]  
*CEC, 2010, DAT POU CONTR REN GE
[5]  
CHUPKA MW, 2003, ELECT J MAY, P46
[6]  
Cory K.S., 2007, The Electricity Journal, V20, P21
[7]  
*CPUC, 2010, RPS PROJ STAT TABL S
[8]  
*EX ASS INC, 2008, PROGR REP REV STAT R
[9]   Comparative analysis of support mechanisms for renewable energy technologies using probability distributions [J].
Falconett, Irina ;
Nagasaka, Ken .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (06) :1135-1144
[10]   The social efficiency of instruments of promotion of renewable energies: A transaction-cost perspective [J].
Finon, Dominique ;
Perez, Yannick .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (01) :77-92