Serum Methionine Metabolites Are Risk Factors for Metastatic Prostate Cancer Progression

被引:77
作者
Stabler, Sally [1 ]
Koyama, Tatsuki [2 ]
Zhao, Zhiguo [2 ]
Martinez-Ferrer, Magaly [3 ]
Allen, Robert H. [1 ]
Luka, Zigmund [4 ]
Loukachevitch, Lioudmila V. [4 ]
Clark, Peter E. [5 ]
Wagner, Conrad [4 ]
Bhowmick, Neil A. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biostat, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Univ Puerto Rico, Dept Surg, San Juan, PR 00936 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biochem, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[6] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2011年 / 6卷 / 08期
关键词
GLYCINE N-METHYLTRANSFERASE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; FOLATE-DEFICIENCY; SARCOSINE; MEN; COBALAMIN; ANTIGEN; MARKER; URINE; ACID;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0022486
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Clinical decision for primary treatment for prostate cancer is dictated by variables with insufficient specificity. Early detection of prostate cancer likely to develop rapid recurrence could support neo-adjuvant therapeutics and adjuvant options prior to frank biochemical recurrence. This study compared markers in serum and urine of patients with rapidly recurrent prostate cancer to recurrence-free patients after radical prostatectomy. Based on previous identification of urinary sarcosine as a metastatic marker, we tested whether methionine metabolites in urine and serum could serve as pre-surgical markers for aggressive disease. Methodology/Principal Findings: Urine and serum samples (n = 54 and 58, respectively), collected at the time of prostatectomy were divided into subjects who developed biochemical recurrence within 2 years and those who remained recurrence-free after 5 years. Multiple methionine metabolites were measured in urine and serum by GC-MS. The role of serum metabolites and clinical variables (biopsy Gleason grade, clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen [PSA]) on biochemical recurrence prediction were evaluated. Urinary sarcosine and cysteine levels were significantly higher (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007 respectively) in the recurrent group. However, in serum, concentrations of homocysteine (p = 0.003), cystathionine (p = 0.007) and cysteine (p<0.001) were more abundant in the recurrent population. The inclusion of serum cysteine to a model with PSA and biopsy Gleason grade improved prediction over the clinical variables alone (p<0.001). Conclusions: Higher serum homocysteine, cystathionine, and cysteine concentrations independently predicted risk of early biochemical recurrence and aggressiveness of disease in a nested case control study. The methionine metabolites further supplemented known clinical variables to provide superior sensitivity and specificity in multivariable prediction models for rapid biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Serum γ-Glutamyltransferase as a Prognostic Biomarker in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Enzalutamide
    Takemura, Kosuke
    Ito, Masaya
    Nakanishi, Yasukazu
    Kataoka, Madoka
    Sakamoto, Kazumasa
    Suzuki, Hiroaki
    Tobisu, Ken-ichi
    Koga, Fumitaka
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (10) : 5773 - 5780
  • [42] Post-diagnostic health behaviour scores and risk of prostate cancer progression and mortality
    Langlais, Crystal S. S.
    Graff, Rebecca E. E.
    Van Blarigan, Erin L. L.
    Neuhaus, John M. M.
    Cowan, Janet E. E.
    Broering, Jeanette M. M.
    Carroll, Peter
    Kenfield, Stacey A. A.
    Chan, June M. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 129 (02) : 346 - 355
  • [43] The number of risk factors is the strongest predictor of prostate cancer mortality: multi-institutional outcomes of an extreme-risk prostate cancer cohort
    Gomez-Iturriaga, A.
    Cabeza, A.
    Pastor, J.
    Jove, J.
    Casana, M.
    Caamano, A. G.
    Mengual, J.
    Henriquez, I.
    Munoz, J.
    Hervas, A.
    Segundo, C. G. -S.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 (10) : 1026 - 1033
  • [44] The cost impact of disease progression to metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Chaves, Leonardo Passos
    Feng, Qi
    Zhu, Julia
    Sandin, Rickard
    Abbott, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2022, 28 (05) : 544 - 554
  • [45] Heterogeneity of Radiological Progression Patterns and Association with Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Ni, Xudong
    Wu, Junlong
    Pan, Jian
    Li, Xiaomeng
    Fang, Bangwei
    Wei, Yu
    Ye, Dingwei
    Liang, Fei
    Zhu, Yao
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (04): : 897 - 905
  • [46] Prostate Cancer Scoring Index for Risk of Progression of Radioresistant Disease
    Tesar, Eleonora Cini
    Mikolasevic, Ivana
    Skocilic, Iva
    Redjovic, Arnela
    Vucinic, Damir
    Marusic, Jasna
    Djordjevic, Gordana
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [47] A retrospective study on the incidence, management and risk factors of skin rash in patients with advanced prostate cancer in Japan
    De Moor, Raf
    Koroki, Yosuke
    Wu, David Bin-Chia
    Yu, Dae Young
    Tohyama, Mikiko
    Ohyama, Chikara
    BMC UROLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [48] Prognostic Impacts of Metastatic Site and Pain on Progression to Castrate Resistance and Mortality in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Koo, Kyo Chul
    Park, Sang Un
    Kim, Ki Hong
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Yang, Seung Ghoul
    Chung, Byung Ha
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (05) : 1206 - 1212
  • [49] Risk factors of developing visceral metastases at diagnosis in prostate cancer patients
    Xu, Ning
    Wu, Yu-Peng
    Ke, Zhi-Bin
    Liang, Ying-Chun
    Tao, Xuan
    Chen, Shao-Hao
    Li, Xiao-Dong
    Cai, Hai
    Lin, Yun-Zhi
    Lin, Ting-Ting
    Xue, Xue-Yi
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (03) : 928 - 938
  • [50] Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer
    Lellig, K.
    Beyer, B.
    Graefen, M.
    Zaak, D.
    Stief, C.
    UROLOGE, 2014, 53 (07): : 1031 - 1039