Community events as part of age-friendly community practice

被引:5
作者
Pope, Natalie Elaine [1 ]
Greenfield, Emily [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Social Work, 390 George St,6th Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
Age-friendly communities; healthy aging; community development; aging in community; program implementation; capacity building; INITIATIVES;
D O I
10.1080/10705422.2022.2106526
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
As the number of localities committing to age-friendly progress increases worldwide, there is growing interest in the processes and contexts that lead to systemic and long-term age-friendly community (AFC) impact. Our study aimed to advance research in this area by exploring community events as a mechanism through which practitioners work toward AFC goals. We used semi-structured interview data with core teams that participated in a multi-year developmental evaluation of eight grant-funded AFC initiatives in New Jersey. We employed a constructivist grounded theory approach to analyze the data, focusing on how AFC leaders facilitate events and what they perceive as the value of events. Findings highlighted the centrality of an inter-organizational context for event planning and implementation, as well as the unique positioning of AFC leaders relative to other community actors. Results further indicated that AFC leaders view events as immediately benefiting older adults and local organizational partners, while also having longer-term strategic value, including by deepening older adults' engagement with the AFC initiative, providing opportunities for core teams to learn about aging in community, and expanding the AFC initiative's community presence. We interpret these findings within a community-building framework, theorizing that events can strategically build relational capacity to sustain age-friendly progress within broader community systems.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 318
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] Lehning AJ, 2017, J HOUS ELDER, V31, P178, DOI 10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937
  • [22] Developing rural insights for building age-friendly communities
    McCrillis, Elizabeth
    Skinner, Mark W.
    Colibaba, Amber
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 81 : 336 - 344
  • [23] Facilitators and Barriers to Becoming Age-Friendly: A Review
    Menec, Verena
    Brown, Cara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2022, 34 (02) : 175 - 197
  • [24] Menec VH, 2017, J HOUS ELDER, V31, P99, DOI 10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926
  • [25] Neal M.B., 2014, Evaluating your age-friendly community program: A step-by-step guide
  • [26] Giving, Receiving, and Doing Together: Interorganizational Interactions in Age-Friendly Community Initiatives
    Pestine-Stevens, Althea
    Greenfield, Emily A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2022, 34 (02) : 218 - 236
  • [27] Making communities age friendly: state and municipal initiatives in Canada and other countries
    Plouffe, Louise A.
    Kalache, Alexandre
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2011, 25 : 131 - 137
  • [28] Reason P., 2003, QUA SOC WORK, V2, P155, DOI DOI 10.1177/1473325003002002003
  • [29] Developing Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: Eleven Case Studies from around the World
    Remillard-Boilard, Samuele
    Buffel, Tine
    Phillipson, Chris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [30] Emergent Challenges and Opportunities to Sustaining Age-friendly Initiatives: Qualitative Findings from a Canadian Age-friendly Funding Program
    Russell, Elizabeth
    Skinner, Mark W.
    Fowler, Ken
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2022, 34 (02) : 198 - 217