Environmental administrative penalty, environmental disclosures, and the firm's cash flow: evidence from manufacturing firms in China

被引:18
作者
Ding, Xiangan [1 ]
Shahzad, Mohsin [2 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Normal Univ, Sch Govt, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Dalian, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental information disclosure; Environmental administrative penalty; Firm's cash flow; Mediating effect of incremental disclosures; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INFORMATION DISCLOSURE; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; LEGITIMATION; PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT; COST; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-18145-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental administrative penalty is a strong tool for the government to regulate environmental pollution. The influence of an environmental administrative penalty on a firm's cash flow has become a hot topic in academics and industry. By employing ordinary least square and the bootstrap method, it is established that the penalty significantly reduces the firm's cash flow in the succeeding year through incremental disclosures which play a mediating role. Further, we distinguished environmental information's nature and then measured it from negative, sensitive (hard) information and positive (soft) information aspects. However, it is found that the mediating effect of the two types of disclosure increment did not exist, respectively. These results help us to comprehend the significance of environmental management to the stability of corporate cash flow and have practical illumination to corporate environmental management and environmental pollution control.
引用
收藏
页码:36674 / 36683
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Why do firms save cash from cash flows? Evidence from firm-level estimation of cash-cash flow sensitivities [J].
D'Espallier, Bert ;
Huybrechts, Jolien ;
Schoubben, Frederiek .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2014, 54 (04) :1125-1156
[32]   The impact of environmental regulation on firms' markups: evidence from China [J].
Ai, Hongshan ;
Tan, Xiaoqing ;
Zhong, Tenglong ;
Zhou, Yuhan .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025, 57 (29) :4188-4201
[33]   The competitive determinants of a firm's environmental management activities: Evidence from US manufacturing industries [J].
Hofer, Christian ;
Cantor, David E. ;
Dai, Jing .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2012, 30 (1-2) :69-84
[34]   Environmental Discourse and Firm Value: Evidence From Conference Calls [J].
Henry, Elaine ;
Jiang, Xi ;
Rozario, Andrea M. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2024,
[35]   Environmental protection tax and trade credit: Evidence from China [J].
Lu, Xueyao ;
Cheng, Lin ;
Niu, Yuhao .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2025, 25 (01)
[36]   Environmental performance and bank lending: Evidence from unlisted firms [J].
Wellalage, Nirosha Hewa ;
Kumar, Vijay .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (07) :3309-3329
[37]   Do Politically Connected Firms Pay Less Toward Environmental Protection? Firm-level Evidence from Polluting Industries in China [J].
Wang, Lihong ;
Kang, Shaoqing ;
Wu, Hongjun .
ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2021, 57 (02) :362-405
[38]   The impact of environmental regulation on firm exports: evidence from environmental information disclosure policy in China [J].
Jiayu Fang ;
Cenjie Liu ;
Chao Gao .
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 :37101-37113
[39]   Environmental corporate social responsibility practices and firm innovation: Complementarities and empirical evidence from Spanish firms [J].
Garcia-Piqueres, Gema ;
Garcia-Ramos, Rebeca .
HELIYON, 2024, 10 (08)
[40]   Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Product Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms [J].
Ning, Lutao ;
Pan, Xin ;
Xu, Xuhong .
2017 IEEE TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SOCIETY CONFERENCE (TEMSCON), 2017, :350-359