Measurement contextuality is implied by macroscopic realism

被引:7
作者
Chen, Zeqian [1 ]
Montina, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Wuhan Inst Phys & Math, Wuhan 430071, Peoples R China
[2] Perimeter Inst Theoret Phys, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5, Canada
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2011年 / 83卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
HIDDEN-VARIABLES; QUANTUM;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.83.042110
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Ontological theories of quantum mechanics provide a realistic description of single systems by means of well-defined quantities conditioning the measurement outcomes. In order to be complete, they should also fulfill the minimal condition of macroscopic realism. Under the assumption of outcome determinism and for Hilbert space dimension greater than 2, they were all proved to be contextual for projective measurements. In recent years a generalized concept of noncontextuality was introduced that applies also to the case of outcome indeterminism and unsharp measurements. It was pointed out that the Beltrametti-Bugajski model is an example of measurement noncontextual indeterminist theory. Here we provide a simple proof that this model is the only one with such a feature for projective measurements and Hilbert space dimension greater than 2. In other words, there is no extension of quantum theory providing more accurate predictions of outcomes and simultaneously preserving the minimal labeling of events through projective operators. As a corollary, noncontextuality for projective measurements implies noncontextuality for unsharp measurements. By noting that the condition of macroscopic realism requires an extension of quantum theory, unless a breaking of unitarity is invoked, we arrive at the conclusion that the only way to solve the measurement problem in the framework of an ontological theory is by relaxing the hypothesis of measurement noncontextuality in its generalized sense.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   ON PROBLEM OF HIDDEN VARIABLES IN QUANTUM MECHANICS [J].
BELL, JS .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1966, 38 (03) :447-&
[2]  
Bell JS., 1987, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics
[3]   A CLASSICAL EXTENSION OF QUANTUM-MECHANICS [J].
BELTRAMETTI, EG ;
BUGAJSKI, S .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1995, 28 (12) :3329-3343
[4]   Quantum states and generalized observables: A simple proof of Gleason's theorem [J].
Busch, P .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2003, 91 (12) :120403-120403
[5]  
COLBECK R, ARXIV10055173
[6]  
GLEASON AM, 1957, J MATH MECH, V6, P885
[7]  
Griffiths R. B., 2003, CONSISTENT QUANTUM T
[8]   Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States [J].
Harrigan, Nicholas ;
Spekkens, Robert W. .
FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS, 2010, 40 (02) :125-157
[9]  
KOCHEN S, 1967, J MATH MECH, V17, P59
[10]   QUANTUM-MECHANICS VERSUS MACROSCOPIC REALISM - IS THE FLUX THERE WHEN NOBODY LOOKS [J].
LEGGETT, AJ ;
GARG, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1985, 54 (09) :857-860