The size of good and bad volatility shocks does matter for spillovers

被引:31
作者
Bouri, Elie [1 ]
Harb, Etienne [2 ]
机构
[1] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] ESSCA Sch Management, Angers, France
关键词
Global stock markets; High -frequency data; Realized semivariances; Extreme good and bad volatility; Shock size at various quantiles; Tail -based spillovers; relative intensity of shock spillover (RISS); COVID-19; pandemic; Quantile connectedness; STOCK MARKETS EVIDENCE; ASYMMETRIC VOLATILITY; US; CONNECTEDNESS; RETURNS; CRISIS; CHINA; POWER; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101626
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Based on the rationale that the propagation of stock volatility shocks within a system can be affected by the size of shocks, we apply a tail-based approach of spillovers based on the variance decomposition of a quantile vector autoregression model. The analysis involves the decomposition of the realized variance into positive and negative realized semivariances using 5-min data on six major stock market indices from the US, Eurozone, UK, Japan, China, and India for the period February 14, 2000 - September 30, 2021. The results show that the propagation of volatility shocks within the system is not only shaped by the sign of the shocks (good versus bad volatility) but also by the shock size. For each good and bad volatility spillover, we detect a heterogeneity resulting from the difference in the size of spillovers between the upper and middle quantiles and thus reveal a relative intensity effect, as measured by the Relative Intensity of Shock Spillover (RISS) measure which we propose herein. This points to the necessity of going beyond studying spillovers of average shocks and employing tail-based models capable of uncovering the heterogeneous and intensity effects of the shock size. Otherwise, these features remain hidden, leading to suboptimal inferences and policy implications.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Abosedra Salah, 2021, J Econ Asymmetries, V24, pe00227, DOI 10.1016/j.jeca.2021.e00227
[2]   Exploring GDP growth volatility spillovers across countries [J].
Abosedra, Salah ;
Arayssi, Mahmoud ;
Ben Sita, Bernard ;
Mutshinda, Crispin .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 89 :577-589
[3]   Systemic risk spillover across global and country stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Abuzayed, Bana ;
Bouri, Elie ;
Al-Fayoumi, Nedal ;
Jalkh, Naji .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2021, 71 :180-197
[4]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[5]   Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbor truncation [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Dobrev, Dobrislav ;
Schaumburg, Ernst .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2012, 169 (01) :75-93
[6]   Quantile Connectedness: Modeling Tail Behavior in the Topology of Financial Networks [J].
Ando, Tomohiro ;
Greenwood-Nimmo, Matthew ;
Shin, Yongcheol .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (04) :2401-2431
[7]   International asset allocation with regime shifts [J].
Ang, A ;
Bekaert, G .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2002, 15 (04) :1137-1187
[8]   Dynamic connectedness of uncertainty across developed economies: A time-varying approach [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Gabauer, David ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Plakandaras, Vasilios .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 166 :63-75
[9]   Dynamic return and volatility spillovers among S&P 500, crude oil, and gold [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Ozdemir, Zeynel Abidin ;
Ozdemir, Huseyin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (01) :153-170
[10]  
Barndorff-Nielsen O., 2010, Measuring downside risk-realised semivariance