Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and glaucoma in 2021: where do we stand?

被引:28
|
作者
Stoner, Ari [1 ]
Harris, Alon [2 ]
Oddone, Francesco [3 ]
Belamkar, Aditya [1 ]
Vercellin, Alice Chandra Verticchio [2 ]
Shin, Joshua [4 ]
Januleviciene, Ingrida [5 ]
Siesky, Brent [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Ophthalmol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Ophthalmol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] IRCCS Fdn GB Bietti, Rome, Italy
[4] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[5] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Eye Clin, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
drugs; glaucoma; pharmacology; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OCULAR BLOOD-FLOW; DORZOLAMIDE-TIMOLOL COMBINATION; BRINZOLAMIDE/BRIMONIDINE FIXED COMBINATION; NORMAL-TENSION GLAUCOMA; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; VISUAL FUNCTION; AQUEOUS-HUMOR; RETROBULBAR HEMODYNAMICS; ACETAZOLAMIDE;
D O I
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319530
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) have been used for many decades in the treatment of glaucoma. Systemic CAIs were an early treatment option to lower intraocular pressure by reducing aqueous humour production; however, frequent side effects including polyuria and paresthesia contributed to the eventual development of topical CAIs. As topical drug development evolved over time, prostaglandin analogues and beta-blockers have become the gold standard of glaucoma therapies. Although prescribed less often than other classes of topical glaucoma therapies, topical CAIs continue to be used in combination therapies with beta-blockers and alpha agonists. Topical CAIs have also been demonstrated to alter biomarkers of ocular haemodynamics, which have relevance in glaucoma. The purpose of this review is to review and summarise the current state of topical CAI prescribing trends, known efficacy and suggested mechanisms and potential influence on ocular haemodynamics for the future of glaucoma management.
引用
收藏
页码:1332 / 1337
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rye and health - Where do we stand and where do we go?
    Jonsson, Karin
    Andersson, Roger
    Knudsen, Knud Erik Bach
    Hallmans, Goran
    Hanhineva, Kati
    Katina, Kati
    Kolehmainen, Marjukka
    Kyro, Cecilie
    Langton, Maud
    Nordlund, Emilia
    Laerke, Helle Nygaard
    Olsen, Anja
    Poutanen, Kajsa
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Landberg, Rikard
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 79 : 78 - 87
  • [42] Perspectives on the design and discovery of α-ketoamide inhibitors for the treatment of novel coronavirus: where do we stand and where do we go?
    Nocentini, Alessio
    Capasso, Clemente
    Supuran, Claudiu T.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2022, 17 (06) : 547 - 557
  • [43] Topical delivery of lipophilic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with liposomal formulations
    Shabana, Ahmed
    Akocak, Suleyman
    Ilies, Marc
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
  • [44] Serious Adverse Events of Oral and Topical Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
    Popovic, Marko M.
    Schlenker, Matthew B.
    Thiruchelvam, Deva
    Redelmeier, Donald A.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 140 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [45] Pharmacological and ocular hypotensive properties of topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
    Sugrue, MF
    PROGRESS IN RETINAL AND EYE RESEARCH, 2000, 19 (01) : 87 - 112
  • [46] Where do we stand in the OECD?
    Buske, L
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1997, 156 (03) : 464 - 464
  • [47] Where do we stand with hepatoblastoma?
    Schnater, JM
    Köhler, SE
    Lamers, WH
    von Schweinitz, D
    Aronson, DC
    CANCER, 2003, 98 (04) : 668 - 678
  • [48] Inflation: Where do we stand?
    Martin, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS A, 2005, 20 (19): : 4676 - 4682
  • [49] GFIS - Where do we stand?
    Anon
    IUFRO News, 2002, 31 (02):
  • [50] The GSEs: Where do we stand?
    Poole, William
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST LOUIS REVIEW, 2007, 89 (03): : 143 - 151