Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and glaucoma in 2021: where do we stand?

被引:28
|
作者
Stoner, Ari [1 ]
Harris, Alon [2 ]
Oddone, Francesco [3 ]
Belamkar, Aditya [1 ]
Vercellin, Alice Chandra Verticchio [2 ]
Shin, Joshua [4 ]
Januleviciene, Ingrida [5 ]
Siesky, Brent [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Ophthalmol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Ophthalmol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] IRCCS Fdn GB Bietti, Rome, Italy
[4] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[5] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Eye Clin, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
drugs; glaucoma; pharmacology; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OCULAR BLOOD-FLOW; DORZOLAMIDE-TIMOLOL COMBINATION; BRINZOLAMIDE/BRIMONIDINE FIXED COMBINATION; NORMAL-TENSION GLAUCOMA; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; VISUAL FUNCTION; AQUEOUS-HUMOR; RETROBULBAR HEMODYNAMICS; ACETAZOLAMIDE;
D O I
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319530
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) have been used for many decades in the treatment of glaucoma. Systemic CAIs were an early treatment option to lower intraocular pressure by reducing aqueous humour production; however, frequent side effects including polyuria and paresthesia contributed to the eventual development of topical CAIs. As topical drug development evolved over time, prostaglandin analogues and beta-blockers have become the gold standard of glaucoma therapies. Although prescribed less often than other classes of topical glaucoma therapies, topical CAIs continue to be used in combination therapies with beta-blockers and alpha agonists. Topical CAIs have also been demonstrated to alter biomarkers of ocular haemodynamics, which have relevance in glaucoma. The purpose of this review is to review and summarise the current state of topical CAI prescribing trends, known efficacy and suggested mechanisms and potential influence on ocular haemodynamics for the future of glaucoma management.
引用
收藏
页码:1332 / 1337
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Vaccines for COVID-19: Where do we stand in 2021?
    Sharma, Ketaki
    Koirala, Archana
    Nicolopoulos, Katrina
    Chiu, Clayton
    Wood, Nicholas
    Britton, Philip N.
    PAEDIATRIC RESPIRATORY REVIEWS, 2021, 39 : 22 - 31
  • [32] MALIGNANT HYPERTENSION HAMA COHORT: WHERE DO WE STAND IN 2021?
    Boulestreau, Romain
    Lorthioir, Aurelien
    Persu, Alexandre
    Cremer, Antoine
    Rubin, Sebastien
    Tharaux, Pierre Louis
    Maier, Benjamin
    Mazighi, Mikael
    Paques, Michel
    Bonnin, Sophie
    Halimi, Jean Michel
    Gosse, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 40 (SUPPL 1) : E283 - E283
  • [33] Gephyrin: where do we stand, where do we go?
    Fritschy, Jean-Marc
    Harvey, Robert J.
    Schwarz, Guenter
    TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2008, 31 (05) : 257 - 264
  • [34] Immune checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer: where do we stand?
    Leary, Alexandra
    Tan, David
    Ledermann, Jonathan
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13
  • [35] Clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors - where do we stand in 2012?
    Drepper, Michael D.
    Spahr, Laurent
    Frossard, Jean Louis
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (18) : 2161 - 2171
  • [36] Prescribing carbonic anhydrase inhibitors to patients with "sulfa" antibiotics allergy: do we dare?
    Quintanilla, Raquel
    van Leeuwen, Luke
    Sharma, Arjun
    Chang, Ta Chen
    Hodapp, Elizabeth
    Mcsoley, John
    Grajewski, Alana
    Bitrian, Elena
    EYE, 2025,
  • [37] Epilepsy: Where do we stand? Where are we headed?
    Elger, C. E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 8 - 8
  • [38] ColVI myopathies: where do we stand, where do we go?
    Valérie Allamand
    Laura Briñas
    Pascale Richard
    Tanya Stojkovic
    Susana Quijano-Roy
    Gisèle Bonne
    Skeletal Muscle, 1
  • [39] ColVI myopathies: where do we stand, where do we go?
    Allamand, Valerie
    Brinas, Laura
    Richard, Pascale
    Stojkovic, Tanya
    Quijano-Roy, Susana
    Bonne, Gisele
    SKELETAL MUSCLE, 2011, 1
  • [40] Investigative dermatology: where do we stand and where do we go?
    Maurer, M.
    von Stebut, E.
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 19 (10) : 857 - 857