Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study

被引:50
作者
Cromi, Antonella [1 ]
Ghezzi, Fabio [1 ]
Agosti, Massimo [2 ,3 ]
Serati, Maurizio [1 ]
Uccella, Stefano [1 ]
Arlant, Veronica [1 ]
Bolis, Pierfrancesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-21100 Varese, Italy
[2] Del Ponte Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Varese, Italy
[3] Del Ponte Hosp, Neonatal Intens Care Unit, Varese, Italy
关键词
cervical ripening; Foley catheter; mechanical method; prostaglandin; ripening time; INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; LABOR INDUCTION; BALLOON; TRIAL; GEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the maximum time for cervical ripening (from 24-12 hours) would influence the efficacy of a transcervical Foley catheter and to compare efficacy to that of a prostaglandin E-2 vaginal insert. STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred ninety-seven women were assigned randomly to (1) Foley catheter left in place for a maximum of 24 hours, (2) Foley catheter left in place for a maximum of 12 hours, or (3) prostaglandin E-2 controlled-release vaginal insert. Primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 hours. RESULTS: There were no differences in vaginal delivery rates. The proportion of women who achieved vaginal delivery in 24 hours was lower in the 24-hour Foley catheter group than in the other 2 groups (24-hour Foley catheter, 21.0%; 12-hour Foley catheter, 59.8%; vaginal prostaglandin E-2, 48.5%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Cutting the ripening time with a Foley catheter by one-half increases the proportion of women who deliver vaginally within 24 hours and yields efficacy similar to that of prostaglandin E-2 vaginal insert.
引用
收藏
页码:338.e1 / 338.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor
    Afolabi, BB
    Oyeneyin, OL
    Ogedengbe, OK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 89 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [2] Oral misoprostol for induction of labour
    Alfirevic, Z.
    Weeks, A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02):
  • [3] Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques
    Barrilleaux, PS
    Bofill, JA
    Terrone, DA
    Magann, EF
    May, WL
    Morrison, JC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) : 1124 - 1129
  • [4] Benzineb N, 1996, Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique, V91, P173
  • [5] BISHOP EH, 1964, OBSTET GYNECOL, V24, P266
  • [6] Boulvain M., 2001, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001233
  • [7] RIPENING OF CERVIX WITH EXTRA-AMNIOTIC PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 IN VISCOUS GEL BEFORE INDUCTION OF LABOR
    CALDER, AA
    EMBREY, MP
    TAIT, T
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1977, 84 (04): : 264 - 268
  • [8] A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction
    Chung, JH
    Huang, WH
    Rumney, PJ
    Garite, TJ
    Nageotte, MP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1031 - 1035
  • [9] Cervical ripening with the Foley catheter
    Cromi, A.
    Ghezzi, F.
    Tomera, S.
    Uccella, S.
    Lischetti, B.
    Bolis, P. F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2007, 97 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [10] G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
    Faul, Franz
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    Lang, Albert-Georg
    Buchner, Axel
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) : 175 - 191