Interfragmentary movement in diaphyseal tibia fractures fixed with locked intramedullary nails

被引:58
作者
Augat, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Penzkofer, Rainer [2 ]
Nolte, Alexander [2 ]
Maier, Michael [2 ]
Panzer, Stefanie [3 ]
Von Oldenburg, Geert [4 ]
Pueschl, Klaus [5 ]
Simon, Ulrich [6 ]
Buehren, Volker [2 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ, Biomech Res Lab, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Trauma Ctr Murnau, Biomech Lab, D-82418 Murnau, Germany
[3] Trauma Ctr Murnau, Dept Radiol, D-82418 Murnau, Germany
[4] Stryker Osteosynth Biomech Grp, Schoenkirchen, Germany
[5] Univ Hamburg, Inst Forens Med, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Univ Ulm, Inst Orthopaed Res & Biomech, Ulm, Germany
关键词
fracture fixation; implant; fracture healing; osteosynthesis; biomechanics;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816073cb
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Biomechanical study on cadaveric bones using physiological loading conditions to quantify interfragmentary movements in a tibial shaft fracture model fixed by intramedullary nailing. Methods: Six fresh frozen human cadaveric tibiae were sequentially tested in axial, torsional, 4-point bending, and shear loading configurations. Tests were performed in intact specimens and osteotomized specimens equipped with interlocked intramedullary nails. The amount of clearance of the nail within the intramedullary canal was measured on computed tomography scans. Linear and angular deformations of the fragments were continuously measured in all directions to obtain the exact interfragmentary movements. Results: The amount of movement at the site of the fracture was substantial. Especially shear and torsion resulted in gap movements of up to 10 mm. Movements in the transverse plane were significantly larger than axial movements for all loading conditions. For torsion and bending, a significant portion of the movement of the fracture gap resulted from the flexibility of the intramedullary nail; for compression and shear, the majority of the movement was related to the clearance of the nail within the bone. Conclusions: Clearance of the implant within the medullary canal, the flexibility of the implant itself, and the compliance of the implant (nail and locking screws) within the bone determine the extent of movement. The implant flexibility and the clearance are strongly dependent on the thickness of the intramedullary nail.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Local tissue properties in bone healing: Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap [J].
Augat, P ;
Margevicius, K ;
Simon, J ;
Wolf, S ;
Suger, G ;
Claes, L .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1998, 16 (04) :475-481
[2]   Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model [J].
Augat, P ;
Burger, J ;
Schorlemmer, S ;
Henke, T ;
Peraus, M ;
Claes, L .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2003, 21 (06) :1011-1017
[3]  
AUGAT P, 2002, 8 M INT SOC FRACT RE, P37
[4]   Mechanics and mechano-biology of fracture healing in normal and osteoporotic bone [J].
Augat, Peter ;
Simon, Ulrich ;
Liedert, Astrid ;
Claes, Lutz .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (Suppl 2) :S36-S43
[5]   Predictors of reoperation following operative management of fractures of the tibial shaft [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Tornetta, P ;
Sprague, S ;
Najibi, S ;
Petrisor, T ;
Griffith, L ;
Guyatt, GH .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2003, 17 (05) :353-361
[6]  
Bhat A K, 2006, J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), V14, P138
[7]   Shear does not necessarifly inhibit bone healing [J].
Bishop, N. E. ;
van Rhijn, M. ;
Tami, I. ;
Corveleijn, R. ;
Schneider, E. ;
Ito, K. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (443) :307-314
[8]  
Claes LE, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, pS132
[9]   Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review [J].
Court-Brown, Charles M. ;
Caesar, Ben .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2006, 37 (08) :691-697
[10]   Factors affecting fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of the tibial diaphysis for closed and grade I open fractures [J].
Drosos, GI ;
Bishay, M ;
Karnezis, IA ;
Alegakis, AK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (02) :227-231