THEMATIC THINKING: THE APPREHENSION AND CONSEQUENCES OF THEMATIC RELATIONS

被引:147
作者
Estes, Zachary [1 ]
Golonka, Sabrina [2 ]
Jones, Lara L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Psychol, Warwick, England
[2] Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Dept Psychol, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
来源
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION: ADVANCES IN RESEARCH AND THEORY, VOL 54 | 2011年 / 54卷
关键词
IMAGINING INTERGROUP CONTACT; NOUN-NOUN COMBINATIONS; CONCEPTUAL COMBINATION; ASSOCIATION STRENGTH; SEMANTIC RELATIONS; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; CATEGORIZATION CHOICES; CROSS-CLASSIFICATION; TAXONOMIC RELATIONS; REDUCING-PREJUDICE;
D O I
10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00008-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A thematic relation is a temporal, spatial, causal, or functional relation between things that perform complementary roles in the same scenario or event. For example, cows and milk are related by a production theme, and sails and anchors are related via a boating theme. Thematic relations are distinct from mere associations, scripts, and ad hoc categories. They also contrast and complement taxonomic (categorical) relations such as "fruits" and "furniture." Thematic relations and taxonomic relations arise from distinct processes, as evidenced by numerous neuropsychological and behavioral dissociations. Thematic relations may be apprehended uncontrollably and rapidly according to how frequently and recently they have been encountered. They exert profound effects on many core cognitive processes, including similarity, categorization, memory, language, inference, and analogy, and they exhibit robust processing differences across individuals and cultures. In sum, without such thematic thinking, models of cognition will remain categorically limited.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 294
页数:46
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Allport G. W., 1954, READING ADDISON WESL
[2]   Thematic role assignment in context [J].
Altmann, GTM .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 41 (01) :124-145
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, U S FLORIDA WORD ASS
[5]   AD HOC CATEGORIES [J].
BARSALOU, LW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1983, 11 (03) :211-227
[6]   Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with semantically rich stimuli [J].
Bassok, M ;
Medin, DL .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 36 (03) :311-336
[7]  
Bendig B. W., 2009, NEW FRONTIERS ANALOG, P30
[8]   Differences in preschool children's conceptual strategies when thinking about animate entities and artifacts [J].
Blanchet, N ;
Dunham, PJ ;
Dunham, F .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 37 (06) :791-800
[9]   Thematic and taxonomic relations in preschoolers: The development of flexibility in categorization choices [J].
Blaye, A ;
Bonthoux, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 19 :395-412
[10]   Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions [J].
Boland, JE ;
Tanenhaus, MK ;
Garnsey, SM ;
Carlson, GN .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (06) :774-806