Data-based prediction under uncertainty: CDF-quantile distributions and info-gap robustness

被引:2
作者
Ben-Haim, Yakov [1 ]
Smithson, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Technol & Econ, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Psychol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Probabilistic prediction; Non-probabilistic uncertainty; Data-based modeling; CDF-quantile distributions; Info-gap theory; Robustness; INFORMATION; MODELS; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmp.2018.08.006
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Data underlie understanding of processes and prediction of the future. However, things change; data from one population at one time may have uncertain relevance for modeling or prediction in another population or at another time. Data-based prediction in a changing world requires two complementary capabilities: versatile modeling, integrated with management of uncertainty. We develop a response to this challenge. We focus on statistical models of bounded random variables, associated with additional non-probabilistic uncertainties. We employ CDF-quantile distributions to model the probabilistic aspects of these phenomena. Non-probabilistic uncertainties in parameter values and in the shapes of probability distributions are modeled and managed with the method of robust satisficing from info-gap theory. The robustness to uncertainty is evaluated for alternative estimators. We show that putatively optimal estimators may be less robust than sub-optimal estimators, suggesting preference for a sub-optimal estimator in some circumstances. These two attributes-statistical accuracy and info-gap robustness-trade off against one another. The info-gap robustness function quantifies this trade off. Generic propositions specify the robustness functions and their trade offs, and characterize a class of situations in which preference for sub-optimal estimators can occur. Three examples are discussed. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 30
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science [J].
Henrich, Joseph ;
Heine, Steven J. ;
Norenzayan, Ara .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2010, 33 (2-3) :111-135
[22]   Robustness analysis of trusses with separable load and structural uncertainties [J].
Kanno, Y ;
Takewaki, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2006, 43 (09) :2646-2669
[23]   Regression analysis of variates observed on (0,1): percentages, proportions and fractions [J].
Kieschnick, R ;
McCullough, BD .
STATISTICAL MODELLING, 2003, 3 (03) :193-213
[24]  
Knight F.H., 1921, Risk, uncertainty and profit, DOI 10.34156/9783791046006-108
[25]   Mixed forests and finance - Methodological approaches [J].
Knoke, Thomas .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (03) :590-601
[26]   Is Psychology Suffering From a Replication Crisis? What Does "Failure to Replicate" Really Mean? [J].
Maxwell, Scott E. ;
Lau, Michael Y. ;
Howard, George S. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 70 (06) :487-498
[27]  
Moffitt L. Joe, 2005, J HOMELAND SECURITY, V2
[28]   Evaluation of neural network robust reliability using information-gap theory [J].
Pierce, S. Gareth ;
Ben-Haim, Yakov ;
Worden, Keith ;
Manson, Graeme .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2006, 17 (06) :1349-1361
[29]   A robust journey in the new millennium [J].
Portnoy, S ;
He, XM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (452) :1331-1335
[30]  
Schwartz B., 2004, The paradox of choice: Why more is less