Public acceptance and uptake of oesophageal adenocarcinoma screening strategies: A mixed-methods systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Sijben, Jasmijn [1 ]
Peters, Yonne [1 ]
van der Velden, Kim [1 ]
Rainey, Linda [2 ]
Siersema, Peter D. [1 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Geert Grootepl Zuid 8, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Geert Grootepl Zuid 8, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, NL-6538 SW Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Esophageal Neoplasms; Barrett Esophagus; Mass screening; Early detection of cancer; Endoscopy; Diagnostic Techniques; Digestive System; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Patient reported outcome measures; Patient preference; Patient participation; Qualitative Research; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; TRANSNASAL ESOPHAGOSCOPY; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CANCER; ACCEPTABILITY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; BURDEN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101367
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is increasingly diagnosed and often fatal, thus representing a growing global health concern. Screening for its precursor, Barrett's oesophagus (BO), combined with endoscopic surveillance and treatment of dysplasia might prevent OAC. This review aimed to systematically explore the public's acceptance and uptake of novel screening strategies for OAC. We systematically searched three electronic databases (Ovid Medline/PubMed, Ovid EMBASE and PsycINFO) from date of inception to July 2, 2021 and hand-searched references to identify original studies published in English on acceptability and uptake of OAC screening. Two reviewers independently reviewed and appraised retrieved records and two reviewers extracted data (verified by one other reviewer). Of the 3674 unique records, 19 studies with 15 249 participants were included in the review. Thematic analysis of findings showed that acceptability of OAC screening is related to disease awareness, fear, belief in benefit, practicalities and physical discomfort. The findings were mapped on the Integrated Screening Action Model. Minimally invasive screening tests are generally well-tolerated: patient-reported outcomes were reported for sedated upper endoscopy (tolerability ++), transnasal endoscopy (tolerability +), tethered capsule endomicroscopy (tolerability +/-), and the Cytosponge-TFF3 test (acceptability ++). In discrete choice experiments, individuals mainly valued screening test accuracy. OAC screening has been performed in trials using conventional upper endoscopy (n = 231 individuals), transnasal endoscopy (n = 966), capsule endoscopy (n = 657) and the Cytosponge-TFF3 test (n = 9679), with uptake ranging from 14.5% to 48.1%. Intended participation in OAC screening in questionnaire-based studies ranged from 62.8% to 71.4%. We conclude that the general public seems to have interest in OAC screening. The findings will provide input for the design of a screening strategy that incorporates the public's values and preferences to improve informed participation. Identification of a screening strategy effective in reducing OAC mortality and morbidity remains a crucial prerequisite. Copyright (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Access, acceptance and adherence to cancer prehabilitation: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Watts, Tessa
    Courtier, Nicholas
    Fry, Sarah
    Gale, Nichola
    Gillen, Elizabeth
    Mccutchan, Grace
    Patil, Manasi
    Rees, Tracy
    Roche, Dominic
    Wheelwright, Sally
    Hopkinson, Jane
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2024,
  • [2] The Public's Intended Uptake of Hypothetical Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Screening Scenarios: A Nationwide Survey
    Sijben, Jasmijn
    Rainey, Linda
    Maas, Fleur
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Peters, Yonne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (09): : 1802 - 1812
  • [3] Trust and Public Health Emergency Events: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Sopory, Pradeep
    Novak, Julie M.
    Day, Ashleigh M.
    Eckert, Stine
    Wilkins, Lee
    Padgett, Donyale R.
    Noyes, Jane P.
    Allen, Tomas
    Alexander, Nyka
    Vanderford, Marsha L.
    Gamhewage, Gaya M.
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2022, 16 (04) : 1653 - 1673
  • [4] Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of the general public: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Taylor, Lily C.
    Hutchinson, Alison
    Law, Katie
    Shah, Veeraj
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    Dennison, Rebecca A.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (03) : 989 - 1008
  • [5] Virtual care pathways for people living with HIV: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Farooq, Hamzah Z.
    Whitton, Louise
    Mwendera, Chikondi
    Divall, Pip
    Spitters, Sophie J. I. M.
    Anderson, Jane
    Thornhill, John P.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2025, 26 (01) : 44 - 69
  • [6] A mixed-methods systematic review of the effects of mindfulness on nurses
    Guillaumie, Laurence
    Boiral, Olivier
    Champagne, Julie
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (05) : 1017 - 1034
  • [7] Enablers and barriers to implementing obesity assessments in clinical practice: a rapid mixed-methods systematic review
    Atlantis, Evan
    Chimoriya, Ritesh
    Seifu, Canaan Negash
    Peters, Kath
    Murphy, Gill
    Carr, Bernadette
    Lim, David
    Fahey, P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [8] HIV testing within general practices in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Deblonde, Jessika
    Van Beckhoven, Dominique
    Loos, Jasna
    Boffin, Nicole
    Sasse, Andre
    Noestlinger, Christiana
    Supervie, Virginie
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18
  • [9] The patient involvement in nursing education: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Alberti, Sara
    Ferri, Paola
    Ghirotto, Luca
    Bonetti, Loris
    Rovesti, Sergio
    Vannini, Valeria
    Jackson, Mathieu
    Rossi, Francesca
    Caleffi, Dalia
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2023, 128
  • [10] Exploring Governance Mechanisms in Megaprojects: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Alqershy, Mohammed Taha
    Shi, Qian
    Zhang, Feng
    ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2025, 37 (01) : 90 - 113