Antidiabetic and antiosteoporotic pharmacotherapies for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes-induced bone disease: protocol for two network meta-analyses

被引:7
作者
Deng, Jiawen [1 ]
Abbas, Umaima [1 ]
Chang, Oswin [1 ]
Dhivagaran, Thanansayan [1 ]
Sanger, Stephanie [2 ]
Bozzo, Anthony [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Lib, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Orthped Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
diabetes; bone disease; fractures; network meta-analysis; anti-osteoporotic agent; anti-diabetics; FRACTURE RISK; MELLITUS; OSTEOPOROSIS; DENSITY; INSULIN; WOMEN; INCONSISTENCY; METFORMIN; GLUCOSE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034741
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at risk for a variety of severe debilitating effects. One of the most serious complications experienced by patients with T2DM are skeletal diseases caused by changes in the bone microenvironment. As a result, patients with T2DM are at risk for higher prevalence of fragility fractures. There are a variety of treatments available for counteracting this effect. Some antidiabetic medications, such as metformin, have been shown to have a positive effect on bone health without the addition of additional drugs into patients' treatment plans. Chinese randomised controlled trial (RCT) studies have also proposed antiosteoporotic pharmacotherapies as a viable alternative treatment strategy. Previous network meta-analyses (NMAs) and meta-analyses regarding this topic did not include all available RCT trials, or only performed pairwise comparisons. We present a protocol for a two-part NMA that incorporates all available RCT data to provide the most comprehensive ranking of antidiabetics (part I) and antiosteoporotic (part II) pharmacotherapies in terms of their ability to decrease fracture incidences, increase bone mineral density (BMD) and improve indications of bone turnover markers (BTMs) in adult patients with T2DM. Methods and analysis We will search Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese literature sources (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP Information, Wanfang Data, Wanfang Med Online) for RCTs, which fit our criteria. We will include adult patients with T2DM who have taken antidiabetics (part I) or antiosteoporotic (part II) therapies with relevant outcome measures in our study. We will perform title/abstract and full-text screening as well as data extraction in duplicate. Risk of bias will be evaluated in duplicate for each study, and the quality of evidence will be examined using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis in accordance to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. We will use R and gemtc to perform the NMA. We will report changes in BMD and BTMs in either weighted or standardised mean difference, and we will report fracture incidences as ORs. We will use the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve scores to provide numerical estimates of the rankings of interventions. Ethics and dissemination The study will not require ethics approval. The findings of the two-part NMA will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. We aim to produce the most comprehensive quantitative analysis regarding the management of T2DM bone disease. Our analysis should be able to provide physicians and patients with up-to-date recommendations for antidiabetic medications and antiosteoporotic pharmacotherapies for maintaining bone health in patients with T2DM. PROSPERO registration number .
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus: what do we know, and what we can do?
    Abdulameer, Shaymaa Abdalwahed
    Sulaiman, Syed Azhar Syed
    Hassali, Mohamed Azmi Ahmad
    Subramaniam, Karuppiah
    Sahib, Mohanad Naji
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2012, 6 : 435 - 448
  • [2] Amer Diabet Assoc, 2012, DIABETES CARE, V35, pS64, DOI [10.2337/dc12-S064, 10.2337/dc23-S002, 10.2337/dc09-S062, 10.2337/dc18-S002]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, LANCET HIV, V2017, pPE475
  • [4] [Anonymous], IDF CLIN PRACT REC M
  • [5] [Anonymous], MOD DIAGN TREAT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2015, A language and environment for statistical computing
  • [7] [Anonymous], CIN CONF NETW MET 20
  • [8] [Anonymous], CHINA J PHARM EC
  • [9] [Anonymous], J LIAONING U TCM
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2019, CLASS DIAB MELL 2019