Influence of ozone on the composite-to-composite bond

被引:14
|
作者
Magni, Elisa [1 ,2 ]
Ferrari, Marco [1 ]
Papacchini, Federica [1 ]
Hickel, Reinhard [2 ]
Ilie, Nicoleta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Fixed Prosthodont & Dent Mat, Policlin Le Scotte, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Restorat Dent & Periodontol, Sch Dent, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
Composite repair; Shear bond strength; Ozone; Thermocycling; MINIMAL INTERVENTION; DENTAL COMPOSITES; CARIOUS LESIONS; GAS APPLICATION; STRENGTH; RESTORATIONS; AGENTS; REPAIR; LONGEVITY; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-009-0370-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The study evaluated the effect of ozone application on the composite-to-composite bond. Three hundred and twenty cylindrical composite specimens were divided into two groups: group 1 was subjected to a 60 s ozone application, whereas group 2 remained untreated. Four subgroups were obtained from each group according to the intermediate repair agent: an adhesive, a silane, silane/adhesive combination, or flowable composite. Repair composite cylinders were built-up. The composite repair strength was tested after 24 h and after thermocycling with a shear test. Additionally, 4 mm x 4 mm x 2 mm composite specimens were prepared and stored 24 h in deionized water. Half of the specimens were subjected to ozone application and the other served as control. The elastic modulus (E) and the Vicker's hardness (VH) of the composite surfaces were tested immediately and after thermocycling. Significant differences among the experimental groups were detected (p < 0.001). The composite repair strength was affected by the pretreatment and by the intermediate agent, whereas, the thermocycling was not significant. The partial eta-squared statistics showed that the intermediate agent was the main factor affecting the composite repair strength, whereas the pretreatment played a minor role. No differences were observed between ozone and control groups when the same intermediate agent and the same aging conditions were applied. Repairing with flowable composite tended to achieve higher bond strengths (20.7 and 26.5 MPa in ozone and control groups, respectively, after 24 h). The use of silane coupling agent showed the lowest composite repair strengths. Ozone did not affect E and VH (p > 0.05) and the thermocycling affected only E (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the application of ozone does not impair the composite-to-composite bond.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Repair Bond Strength of a CAD/CAM Nanoceramic Resin and Direct Composite Resin: Effect of Aging and Surface Conditioning Methods
    Duarte Moura, Dayanne Monielle
    de Oliveira Dal Piva, Amanda Maria
    do Nascimento Januario, Ana Beatriz
    Verissimo, Aretha Heitor
    Bottino, Marco Antonio
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    Assuncao Souza, Rodrigo Othavio
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 22 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [42] Impact of repair protocols on the bond strength to composite resin
    Vilela, Ana Laura Rezende
    Soares, Amanda das Gracas
    Machado, Alexandre Coelho
    Borges, Marcela Goncalves
    Raposo, Luis Henrique Araujo
    Menezes, Murilo de Sousa
    ODONTOLOGY, 2024, : 685 - 692
  • [43] Comparison of the Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Zirconia and Composite Resin to Polyether Ether Ketone: An In Vitro Study
    Sarfaraz, Hasan
    Rasheed, Mohammed N.
    Shetty, Sanath K.
    Prabhu, Uma M.
    Fernandes, Kevin
    Mohandas, Smrithi
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 12 : 504 - 509
  • [44] Effect of different surface treatments on the composite–composite repair bond strength
    Andreas Rathke
    Yana Tymina
    Bernd Haller
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2009, 13
  • [45] The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between CAD/CAM Blocks and Composite Resin
    Duzyol, Mustafa
    Sagsoz, Omer
    Sagsoz, Nurdan Polat
    Akgul, Nilgun
    Yildiz, Mehmet
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (06): : 466 - 471
  • [46] Influence of Expasyl and Viscostat on Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Dentin with Different Adhesives
    Albaker, Abdulaziz M.
    Alsahhaf, Abdulaziz
    Mubaraki, Sarah A.
    Al Deeb, Modhi
    Al Deeb, Laila
    Al Ahdal, Khold
    Vohra, Fahim
    Abduljabbar, Tariq
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2019, 9 (10) : 1454 - 1458
  • [47] Effect of Composite Age on the Repair Bond Strength after Different Mechanical Surface Pretreatments
    Dieckmann, Phoebe
    Baur, Anina
    Dalvai, Vanessa
    Wiedemeier, Daniel B.
    Attin, Thomas
    Taubock, Tobias T.
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 22 (04) : 365 - 372
  • [48] Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials
    Junior, Sinval A. Rodrigues
    Ferracane, Jack L.
    Della Bona, Alvaro
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2009, 25 (04) : 442 - 451
  • [49] The efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and contemporary universal adhesive systems on composite resin repair bond strength: an in vitro study
    Dogan, Ecem
    Ozkocak, Begum Busra Cevval
    ODONTOLOGY, 2024, 112 (04) : 1197 - 1208
  • [50] The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam
    Blum, Igor R.
    Hafiana, Khaula
    Curtis, Andrew
    Barbour, Michele E.
    Attin, Thomas
    Lynch, Christopher D.
    Jagger, Daryll C.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (01) : 15 - 21