Do Light Rail Transit Planning Decisions Affect Metropolitan Transit Performance? Examination of Eight US Metropolitan Areas with Light Rail Transit Backbones

被引:6
|
作者
Jaroszynski, Michal A. [1 ]
Brown, Jeffrey R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
SERVICE ORIENTATION; RIDERSHIP; MULTIDESTINATION; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.3141/2419-06
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In 2011, light rail transit (LRT) in eight US. metropolitan areas Phoenix, Arizona; Sacramento and San Diego, California; Denver, Colorado; Saint Louis, Missouri; Portland, Oregon; Dallas, Texas; and Salt Lake City, Utah carried 20% or more of the metropolitan area's total fixed-route ridership. The study reported in this paper explored the role of socioeconomic, planning, and operational factors as influences on LRT and metropolitan fixed-route performance in these eight areas, where LRT might function as a backbone around which other transit services were organized. Of particular interest were the planning and operational decisions over which planners and policy makers exercised some control. With the use of a combination of national and agency data, the eight areas were ranked on criteria with a basis in the optimal conditions suggested by a review of the literature. These rankings were then related to performance. The results showed that although socioeconomic factors were important influences on performance, they were not determinative. Planning and operational decisions about coverage, access, and multimodal coordination and integration also emerged as important influences on LRT and metropolitan transit performance.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 62
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Examining the performance of transit systems in large US metropolitan areas
    Singer, Matan E. E.
    Cohen-Zada, Aviv L. L.
    Martens, Karel
    TRANSPORTATION, 2024, 51 (03) : 1125 - 1147
  • [22] Planning and assessment system for light rail transit construction in Taiwan
    Hsu, Wei-Ling
    Tsai, Fu-Ming
    Shiau, Yan-Chyuan
    MICROSYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES-MICRO-AND NANOSYSTEMS-INFORMATION STORAGE AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS, 2021, 27 (04): : 1051 - 1060
  • [23] Planning and assessment system for light rail transit construction in Taiwan
    Wei-Ling Hsu
    Fu-Ming Tsai
    Yan-Chyuan Shiau
    Microsystem Technologies, 2021, 27 : 1051 - 1060
  • [24] Comparison of emissions from light rail transit and bus rapid transit
    Puchalsky, CM
    TRANSIT: PLANNING, MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE, TECHNOLOGY, MARKETING AND FARE POLICY, AND CAPACITY AND QUALTIY OF SEVICE, 2005, 1927 : 31 - 37
  • [25] A Light Rail, Group Rapid Transit, Personal Rapid Transit Comparison
    Muller, Peter J.
    Andreasson, Ingmar J.
    AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVERS AND AUTOMATED TRANSIT SYSTEMS 2018: MOVING TO THE FUTURE, BUILDING ON THE PAST, 2018, : 1 - 11
  • [26] CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)
    Peng, Ng Ying
    Ismail, Wan Rosmanira
    Suradi, Nur Riza
    Mustafa, Zainol
    Ali, Zalina Mohd
    Mohammad, Rofizah
    Ahmad, Faridatulazna
    NEW ASPECTS OF URBAN PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION, 2008, : 87 - 95
  • [27] LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT GRADE SEPARATION GUIDELINES
    STONE, TJ
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 1993, 63 (01): : 38 - 40
  • [28] BRINGING LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT BACK TO BRITAIN
    RUSSELL, J
    DAVIES, F
    SIEMENS REVIEW, 1992, 59 (02): : 24 - 27
  • [30] LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT IN THE UNITED-STATES
    TAYLOR, SF
    TRANSPORTATION, 1980, 9 (01) : 67 - 74