Comparison of angular free-in-air and tissue-equivalent phantom response measurements in p-MOSFET dosimeters

被引:22
作者
Pomije, BD
Huh, CH
Tressler, MA
Hintenlang, DE
Bolch, WE
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Nucl & Radiol Engn, Nucl Sci Ctr 202, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] USN, San Diego Med Ctr, San Diego, CA 92134 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2001年 / 80卷 / 05期
关键词
phantom; tissue equivalence; dosimetry; internal; x rays;
D O I
10.1097/00004032-200105000-00011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) radiation dosimeters have found recent application in providing real-time measurement in diagnostic radiology as well as in radiotherapy. Due to the design of the MOSFET dosimeter, the response is dependent on both energy and angulation with respect to the direction of primary radiation, The axial angular dependence has been characterized for both free-in-air and for tissue-equivalent phantoms, However, neither the angular dependence normal (90-degree) to the axial rotation, nor the effects of various tissue compositions on angular dependence, have been investigated for radiation energies in the diagnostic range. To characterize the angular dependence normal to the axial rotation, we exposed three "high sensitivity" MOSFET dosimeters simultaneously to x-rays from a medical diagnostic x-ray unit over a 360-degree rotation, at 22.5-degree increments, for both free-in-air and in lung, skeletal, and soft tissue-equivalent phantoms, The MOSFET dosimeters clearly showed an angular dependence in the orientation normal-to-axial as well as in the axial rotation, both for free-in-air and in tissue-equivalent phantoms, Significant variations in response occurred when the MOSFETs were exposed at incident angles between 90 degrees and 180 degrees normal-to-axial, as compared to the normal position (i,e,, the zero-degree position with the bubble-side of the MOSFETs facing the radiation source). A maximum decrease in response to 32% of normal was observed when the distal ends tend opposite the wire lead) of the dosimeters were pointing directly away from the x-ray source (270-degree position), To avoid significant errors in MOSFET dosimeter readings, placement of the dosimeters should be consistent, and care should be taken to avoid orienting the dosimeter with its sensitive region (bubble side) facing away from the source of primary radiation at particular angles.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 505
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   The characterization of a commercial MOSFET dosimeter system for use in diagnostic x ray [J].
Bower, MW ;
Hintenlang, DE .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1998, 75 (02) :197-204
[2]  
BOWER MW, 1997, THESIS U FLORIDA GAI
[3]   A new radiotherapy surface dose detector: The MOSFET [J].
Butson, MJ ;
Rozenfeld, A ;
Mathur, JN ;
Carolan, M ;
Wong, TPY ;
Metcalfe, PE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (05) :655-658
[4]  
CRISTY M, 1987, ORNLTM8381, V1
[5]   Radiation effects simulation using an unified MOSFET model [J].
GarciaMoreno, E ;
Iniguez, B .
PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 1997, T69 :142-145
[6]   A MINIATURE MOSFET RADIATION DOSIMETER PROBE [J].
GLADSTONE, DJ ;
LU, XQ ;
HUMM, JL ;
BOWMAN, HF ;
CHI, LM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (11) :1721-1728
[7]   Investigation of on-chip high temperature annealing of PMOS dosimeters [J].
Kelleher, A ;
Lane, W ;
Adams, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1996, 43 (03) :997-1001
[8]   Clinical dosimetry using MOSFETS [J].
Ramani, R ;
Russell, S ;
OBrien, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (04) :959-964
[9]   EVALUATION OF A DUAL BIAS DUAL METAL-OXIDE-SILICON SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR DETECTOR AS RADIATION DOSIMETER [J].
SOUBRA, M ;
CYGLER, J ;
MACKAY, G .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (04) :567-572
[10]   Limitations on MOSFET dosimeter resolution imposed by 1/f noise [J].
Tarr, NG ;
Plett, C ;
Yeaton, A ;
Mackay, GF ;
Thomson, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1996, 43 (05) :2492-2495