CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2018 versus CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 in the diagnosis of primary hepatic nodules in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:18
|
作者
Lv, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Xin [1 ,3 ]
Dong, Yinlei [4 ]
Geng, Daoying [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Radiol, 12 Wulumuqi Middle Rd, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Inst Funct & Mol Med Imaging, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Ctr Shanghai Intelligent Imaging Crit Brain Dis E, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Pancreat Dis Inst, Dept Pancreat Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; CIRRHOSIS;
D O I
10.21037/atm-21-1035
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to explore the application value of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS version 2017 in high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and to conduct a comparative analysis. Methods: This study enrolled 250 high-risk HCC patients with 259 primary hepatic nodules from June 2017 to June 2020. Two investigators used a single-blind method to classify all nodules. The u-test, t-test, and Kappa test were performed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value and receiver operating characteristic curves of LR-5 and LR-M in the diagnosis of HCC and non-HCC malignancy were respectively calculated. Results: CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 showed substantial agreement interobservers, and there was a moderate agreement inter-modality. The specificity and PPV of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in CT/MRI LR-5/M were higher than CEUS. The areas under the curve (AUC) of CT/MRI LR-5 and LR-M were 0.794 and 0.777, and the AUC of CEUS LR-5 and LR-M were 0.720 and 0.718, respectively. Conclusions: Two modalities have substantial agreement inter-observers and moderate agreement intermodalities. The diagnostic accuracy of HCC of CT/MRI LR-5 and non-HCC malignancy of CT/MRI LR-M are higher than CEUS.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Hu, Yi-Xin
    Shen, Jing-Xian
    Han, Jing
    Mao, Si-Yue
    Mao, Ru-Shuang
    Li, Qing
    Li, Fei
    Guo, Zhi-Xing
    Zhou, Jian-Hua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [2] LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium enhanced MRI
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Yang, Hyun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (03) : 655 - 663
  • [3] MR VERSUS CEUS LI-RADS FOR DISTINGUISHING HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA FROM OTHER HEPATIC MALIGNANCIES IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS
    Huang, Zhe
    Zhou, Pingping
    Li, Shanshan
    Li, Kaiyan
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 47 (05) : 1244 - 1252
  • [4] Imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: LI-RADS
    Cunha, Guilherme Moura
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [5] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Ding, Jianmin
    Long, Lei
    Zhang, Xiang
    Chen, Chen
    Zhou, Hongyu
    Zhou, Yan
    Wang, Yandong
    Jing, Xiang
    Ye, Zhaoxiang
    Wang, Fengmei
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 847 - 854
  • [6] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Jianmin Ding
    Lei Long
    Xiang Zhang
    Chen Chen
    Hongyu Zhou
    Yan Zhou
    Yandong Wang
    Xiang Jing
    Zhaoxiang Ye
    Fengmei Wang
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 847 - 854
  • [7] 2017 Version of LI-RADS for CT and MR Imaging: An Update
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Hooker, Jonathan C.
    Agrons, Michelle M.
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Tang, An
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Do, Richard K.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2017, 37 (07) : 1994 - 2017
  • [8] Differences between CEUS LI-RADS and CECT LI-RADS in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions in patients at risk for HCC
    Rong Wen
    Weiche Huang
    Rui Song
    Lanhui Qin
    Yuquan Wu
    Yuting Peng
    Xiongyan Huang
    Yun He
    Hong Yang
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [9] Differences between CEUS LI-RADS and CECT LI-RADS in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions in patients at risk for HCC
    Wen, Rong
    Huang, Weiche
    Song, Rui
    Qin, Lanhui
    Wu, Yuquan
    Peng, Yuting
    Huang, Xiongyan
    He, Yun
    Yang, Hong
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [10] Analysis of comparative performance of CEUS and CECT/MR LI-RADS classification: Can CEUS dichotomize LI-RADS indeterminate lesions on CT or MRI?
    Tan, Zehao
    Teoh, Wey Chyi
    Wong, Kang Min
    Wansaicheong, Gervais Khin-Lin
    Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2020, 62 : 63 - 68