Optimising workload norms: the influence of shop floor characteristics on setting workload norms for the workload control concept

被引:27
作者
Thuerer, Matthias [3 ]
Silva, Cristovao [2 ]
Stevenson, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Univ Management Sch, Dept Management Sci, Lancaster LA1 4YX, England
[2] Univ Coimbra, CEMUC, Dept Mech Engn, P-3030 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Werkzeugmaschinen & Fabrikbetrieb, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
workload control; workload norm; shop floor characteristics; order release mechanism; optimisation; ORDER RELEASE; PERFORMANCE; APPLICABILITY; PARAMETERS; AGGREGATE; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1080/00207541003604836
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Workload control (WLC) is a leading production planning and control (PPC) solution for small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and make-to-order (MTO) companies, but when WLC is implemented, practitioners find it difficult to determine suitable workload norms to obtain optimum performance. Theory has provided some solutions (e.g., based on linear programming) but, to remain optimal, these require the regular feedback of detailed information from the shop floor about the status of work-in-process (WIP), and are therefore often impractical. This paper seeks to predict workload norms without such feedback requirements, analysing the influence of shop floor characteristics on the workload norm. The shop parameters considered are flow characteristics (from an undirected pure job shop to a directed general flow shop), and the number of possible work centres in the routing of a job (i.e., the routing length). Using simulation and optimisation software, the workload norm resulting in optimum performance is determined for each work centre for two aggregate load-oriented WLC approaches: the classical and corrected load methods. Results suggest that the performance of the classical approach is heavily affected by shop floor characteristics but no direct relationship between the characteristics and norm to apply could be established. In contrast, results suggest that the performance of the corrected load approach is not influenced by shop floor characteristics and the workload norm which results in optimum performance is the same for all experiments. Given the changing nature of MTO production and the difficulties encountered with the classical approach, the corrected load approach is considered a better and more robust option for implementation in practice. Future simulations should investigate the influence of differing capacities across work centres on the workload norm while action research should be conducted to apply the findings in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1171
页数:21
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   LOAD-ORIENTED MANUFACTURING CONTROL JUST-IN-TIME PRODUCTION FOR JOB SHOPS [J].
BECHTE, W .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 1994, 5 (03) :292-307
[2]   Order review and release strategies in a job shop environment: A review and a classification [J].
Bergamaschi, D ;
Cigolini, R ;
Perona, M ;
Portioli, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1997, 35 (02) :399-420
[3]   Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling [J].
Bertrand, JWM ;
Fransoo, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (02) :241-264
[4]   Workload based order release and productivity: a missing link [J].
Bertrand, JWM ;
Van Ooijen, HPG .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (07) :665-678
[5]   The workload control concept: theory and practical extensions of Load Oriented Order Release [J].
Breithaupt, JW ;
Land, M ;
Nyhuis, P .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (07) :625-638
[6]   An experimental investigation on workload limiting methods within ORR policies in a job shop environment [J].
Cigolini, R ;
Portioli-Staudacher, A .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (07) :602-613
[7]   The effectiveness of input control based on aggregate versus bottleneck work loads [J].
Enns, ST ;
Costa, MP .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (07) :614-624
[8]   Concerning the theory of workload control [J].
Fredendall, Lawrence D. ;
Ojha, Divesh ;
Patterson, J. Wayne .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 201 (01) :99-111
[9]  
Glover F, 1996, 1996 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P144, DOI 10.1145/256562.256595
[10]  
Hendry L., 1991, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, V11, P6, DOI 10.1108/01443579110144655