Long-Term Outcome of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Single-Centre Retrospective Study in 1072 Patients Over a 10-Year Period

被引:52
作者
Bilhim, Tiago [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Costa, Nuno Vasco [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Torres, Daniel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pinheiro, Luis Campos [2 ,3 ]
Spaepen, Erik [4 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Hosp, Intervent Radiol Unit, R Luz Soriano 182, P-1200249 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, NOVA Med Sch, Fac Ciencias Med, NMS FCM, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Lisboa Cent CHULC, Dept Urol, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] SBD Analyt, Bekkevoort, Belgium
关键词
Prostatic artery embolization (PAE); Long-term; Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO); Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO); Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS); TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; OPEN PROSTATECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s00270-022-03199-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Assess long-term outcomes of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods Single centre retrospective study from 2009-2019 including 1072 patients who received PAE and had available follow-up. Patients were evaluated yearly at 1-10 years post PAE using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL), prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual (PVR) volume. The need for prostatic medication, re-intervention rates, repeat PAE and prostatectomy rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared between different embolic agents using Cox regression analysis. Results Mean follow-up time was 4.39 +/- 2.37 years. At last follow-up visit, mean IPSS and QoL improvements were - 10.14 +/- 8.34 (p < .0001) and - 1.87 +/- 1.48 (p < .0001) points, mean PV reduction was - 6.82 +/- 41.11 cm(3) (p = 0.7779), mean PSA reduction was - 1.12 +/- 4.60 ng/mL (p = 0.9713), mean Qmax increase was 2.72 +/- 6.38 mL/s (p = 0.0005), mean PVR reduction was - 8.35 +/- 135.75 mL (p = 0.6786). There were 335 patients (31.3%) needing prostatic medication after PAE. Re-intervention rates were 3.4% at 1 year, 21.1% at 5 years and 58.1% at 10 years. Repeat-PAE rates were 2.3% at 1 year, 9.5% at 5 years and 23.1% at 10 years. Prostatectomy rates were 1.1% at 1 year, 11.6% at 5 years and 35.0% at 10 years. No significant differences were found between polyvinyl alcohol particles, Bead Block, Embospheres and Embozenes. Conclusion PAE induces durable long-term LUTS relief, with re-intervention rates of 20% in the first 5 years and 30%-60% > 5 years post-PAE.
引用
收藏
页码:1324 / 1336
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 2-yr Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Single-centre Trial [J].
Abt, Dominik ;
Muellhaupt, Gautier ;
Hechelhammer, Lukas ;
Markart, Stefan ;
Gusewell, Sabine ;
Schmid, Hans-Peter ;
Mordasini, Livio ;
Engeler, Daniel S. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (01) :34-42
[2]   Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial [J].
Abt, Dominik ;
Hechelhammer, Lukas ;
Mullhaupt, Gautier ;
Markart, Stefan ;
Gusewell, Sabine ;
Kessler, Thomas M. ;
Schmid, Hans-Peter ;
Engeler, Daniel S. ;
Mordasini, Livio .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 361
[3]   Prostate Artery Embolization via Transradial or Transulnar versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results [J].
Bhatia, Shivank ;
Harward, Sardis H. ;
Sinha, Vishal K. ;
Narayanan, Govindarajan .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (06) :898-905
[4]   Randomized Clinical Trial of Balloon Occlusion versus Conventional Microcatheter Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [J].
Bilhim, Tiago ;
Costa, Nuno Vasco ;
Torres, Daniel ;
Pisco, Joao ;
Carmo, Sandra ;
Oliveira, Antonio G. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (11) :1798-1806
[5]   Predictors of Clinical Outcome after Prostate Artery Embolization with Spherical and Nonspherical Polyvinyl Alcohol Particles in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [J].
Bilhim, Tiago ;
Pisco, Joao ;
Pereira, Jose A. ;
Costa, Nuno Vasco ;
Fernandes, Lucia ;
Pinheiro, Luis Campos ;
Duarte, Marisa ;
Oliveira, Antonio G. .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 281 (01) :289-300
[6]   Does Polyvinyl Alcohol Particle Size Change the Outcome of Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia? Results from a Single-Center Randomized Prospective Study [J].
Bilhim, Tiago ;
Pisco, Joao ;
Pinheiro, Luis Campos ;
Tinto, Hugo Rio ;
Fernandes, Lacia ;
Pereira, Jose A. ;
Duarte, Marisa ;
Oliveira, Antonio G. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (11) :1595-1602
[7]   Prostatic Arterial Supply: Anatomic and Imaging Findings Relevant for Selective Arterial Embolization [J].
Bilhim, Tiago ;
Pisco, Joao Martins ;
Tinto, Hugo Rio ;
Fernandes, Lucia ;
Pinheiro, Luis Campos ;
Furtado, Andrea ;
Casal, Diogo ;
Duarte, Marisa ;
Pereira, Jose ;
Oliveira, Antonio G. ;
O'Neill, Joao E. G. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (11) :1403-1415
[8]   Prostatic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 10 Years' Experience [J].
Carnevale, Francisco Cesar ;
Moreira, Airton Mota ;
de Assis, Andre Moreira ;
Antunes, Alberto Azoubel ;
de Paula Rodrigues, Vanessa Cristina ;
Srougi, Miguel ;
Cerri, Giovanni Guido .
RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (02) :444-451
[9]   CIRSE Standards of Practice on Prostatic Artery Embolisation [J].
Cornelis, Francois H. ;
Bilhim, Tiago ;
Hacking, Nigel ;
Sapoval, Marc ;
Tapping, Charles R. ;
Carnevale, Francisco Cesar .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (02) :176-185
[10]   Repeat Prostatic Artery Embolization for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [J].
Costa, Nuno, V ;
Torres, Daniel ;
Pisco, Joao ;
Pinheiro, Luis C. ;
Martins, Francisco E. ;
Oliveira, Antonio G. ;
Bilhim, Tiago .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (08) :1272-1280