High-Resolution Smoke Forecasting for the 2018 Camp Fire in California

被引:18
作者
Chow, Fotini Katopodes [1 ]
Yu, Katelyn A. [1 ]
Young, Alexander [1 ,11 ]
James, Eric [2 ,3 ]
Grell, Georg A. [3 ]
Csiszar, Ivan [4 ]
Tsidulko, Marina [5 ]
Freitas, Saulo [6 ,7 ,12 ]
Pereira, Gabriel [8 ]
Giglio, Louis [9 ]
Friberg, Mariel D. [10 ]
Ahmadov, Ravan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, CIRES, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] NOAA, Global Syst Lab, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[4] NOAA, Natl Environm Satellite Data & Informat Serv, Ctr Satellite Applicat & Res, College Pk, MD USA
[5] IM Syst Grp, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Univ Space Res Assoc, Columbia, MD USA
[7] NASA GSFC, Global Modeling & Assimilat Off, Greenbelt, MD USA
[8] Univ Fed Sao Joao del Rei, Dept Geosci, Sao Joao Del Rei, Brazil
[9] Univ Maryland, Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[10] Univ Maryland, NASA GSFC, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[11] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY USA
[12] Natl Inst Space Res, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Dispersion; Numerical weather prediction/forecasting; Aerosols/particulates; Air quality; Forest fires; Wildfires; WEATHER RESEARCH; AIR-QUALITY; PLUME RISE; MODEL; ASSIMILATION; IMPACTS; INCLUSION; WILDFIRES; HEALTH; CYCLE;
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0329.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Smoke from the 2018 Camp Fire in Northern California blanketed a large part of the region for 2 weeks, creating poor air quality in the "unhealthy" range for millions of people. The NOAA Global System Laboratory's HRRR-Smoke model was operating experimentally in real time during the Camp Fire. Here, output from the HRRR-Smoke model is compared to surface observations of PM2.5 from AQS and PurpleAir sensors as well as satellite observation data. The HRRR-Smoke model at 3-km resolution successfully simulated the evolution of the plume during the initial phase of the fire (8-10 November 2018). Stereoscopic satellite plume height retrievals were used to compare with model output (for the first time, to the authors' knowledge), showing that HRRR-Smoke is able to represent the complex 3D distribution of the smoke plume over complex terrain. On 15-16 November, HRRR-Smoke was able to capture the intensification of PM2.5 pollution due to a high pressure system and subsidence that trapped smoke close to the surface; however, HRRR-Smoke later underpredicted PM2.5 levels due to likely underestimates of the fire radiative power (FRP) derived from satellite observations. The intensity of the Camp Fire smoke event and the resulting pollution during the stagnation episodes make it an excellent test case for HRRR-Smoke in predicting PM2.5 levels, which were so high from this single fire event that the usual anthropogenic pollution sources became insignificant. The HRRR-Smoke model was implemented operationally at NOAA/NCEP in December 2020, now providing essential support for smoke forecasting as the impact of U.S. wildfires continues to increase in scope and magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:E1531 / E1552
页数:22
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Ahmadov R, 2017, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P2806, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127581
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, OBSERVING WEATHER CL, DOI DOI 10.17226/12540
  • [3] The Changing Nature of Wildfires Impacts on the Health of the Public
    Balmes, John R.
    [J]. CLINICS IN CHEST MEDICINE, 2020, 41 (04) : 771 - +
  • [4] Near Real-Time Wildfire Progression Monitoring with Sentinel-1 SAR Time Series and Deep Learning
    Ban, Yifang
    Zhang, Puzhao
    Nascetti, Andrea
    Bevington, Alexandre R.
    Wulder, Michael A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [5] Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor
    Barkjohn, Karoline K.
    Gantt, Brett
    Clements, Andrea L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2021, 14 (06) : 4617 - 4637
  • [6] Stratiform Cloud-Hydrometeor Assimilation for HRRR and RAP Model Short-Range Weather Prediction
    Benjamin, Stanley G.
    James, Eric P.
    Hu, Ming
    Alexander, Curtis R.
    Ladwig, Therese T.
    Brown, John M.
    Weygandt, Stephen S.
    Turner, David D.
    Minnis, Patrick
    Smith, William L.
    Heidinger, Andrew K.
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2021, 149 (08) : 2673 - 2694
  • [7] A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: The Rapid Refresh
    Benjamin, Stanley G.
    Weygandt, Stephen S.
    Brown, John M.
    Hu, Ming
    Alexander, Curtis R.
    Smirnova, Tatiana G.
    Olson, Joseph B.
    James, Eric P.
    Dowell, David C.
    Grell, Georg A.
    Lin, Haidao
    Peckham, Steven E.
    Smith, Tracy Lorraine
    Moninger, William R.
    Kenyon, Jaymes S.
    Manikin, Geoffrey S.
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2016, 144 (04) : 1669 - 1694
  • [8] The 2018 Camp Fire: Meteorological Analysis Using In Situ Observations and Numerical Simulations
    Brewer, Matthew J.
    Clements, Craig B.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [9] The changing risk and burden of wildfire in the United States
    Burke, Marshall
    Driscoll, Anne
    Heft-Neal, Sam
    Xue, Jiani
    Burney, Jennifer
    Wara, Michael
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (02)
  • [10] Joint 3D-Wind Retrievals with Stereoscopic Views from MODIS and GOES
    Carr, James L.
    Wu, Dong L.
    Wolfe, Robert E.
    Madani, Houria
    Lin, Guoqing
    Tan, Bin
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (18)