Technical Note: Measuring contrast- and noise-dependent spatial resolution of an iterative reconstruction method in CT using ensemble averaging

被引:56
作者
Yu, Lifeng [1 ]
Vrieze, Thomas J. [1 ]
Leng, Shuai [1 ]
Fletcher, Joel G. [1 ]
McCollough, Cynthia H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
computed tomography (CT); iterative reconstruction (IR); image quality; IMAGE QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; TASK;
D O I
10.1118/1.4916802
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The spatial resolution of iterative reconstruction (IR) in computed tomography (CT) is contrast-and noise-dependent because of the nonlinear regularization. Due to the severe noise contamination, it is challenging to perform precise spatial-resolution measurements at very low-contrast levels. The purpose of this study was to measure the spatial resolution of a commercially available IR method using ensemble-averaged images acquired from repeated scans. Methods: A low-contrast phantom containing three rods (7, 14, and 21 HU below background) was scanned on a 128-slice CT scanner at three dose levels (CTDIvol = 16, 8, and 4 mGy). Images were reconstructed using two filtered-backprojection (FBP) kernels (B40 and B20) and a commercial IR method (sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction, SAFIRE, Siemens Healthcare) with two strength settings (I40-3 and I40-5). The same scan was repeated 100 times at each dose level. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was calculated based on the edge profile measured on the ensemble-averaged images. Results: The spatial resolution of the two FBP kernels, B40 and B20, remained relatively constant across contrast and dose levels. However, the spatial resolution of the two IR kernels degraded relative to FBP as contrast or dose level decreased. For a given dose level at 16 mGy, the MTF50% value normalized to the B40 kernel decreased from 98.4% at 21 HU to 88.5% at 7 HU for I40-3 and from 97.6% to 82.1% for I40-5. At 21 HU, the relative MTF50% value decreased from 98.4% at 16 mGy to 90.7% at 4 mGy for I40-3 and from 97.6% to 85.6% for I40-5. Conclusions: A simple technique using ensemble averaging from repeated CT scans can be used to measure the spatial resolution of IR techniques in CT at very low contrast levels. The evaluated IR method degraded the spatial resolution at low contrast and high noise levels. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2261 / 2267
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods [J].
Chen, Baiyu ;
Christianson, Olav ;
Wilson, Joshua M. ;
Samei, Ehsan .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (07)
[2]   Methods for Clinical Evaluation of Noise Reduction Techniques in Abdominopelvic CT [J].
Ehman, Eric C. ;
Yu, Lifeng ;
Manduca, Armando ;
Hara, Amy K. ;
Shiung, Maria M. ;
Jondal, Dayna ;
Lake, David S. ;
Paden, Robert G. ;
Blezek, Daniel J. ;
Bruesewitz, Michael R. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. ;
Hough, David M. ;
Fletcher, Joel G. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2014, 34 (04) :849-862
[3]   Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: A comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms [J].
Evans, Joshua D. ;
Politte, David G. ;
Whiting, Bruce R. ;
O'Sullivan, Joseph A. ;
Williamson, Jeffrey F. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) :1444-1458
[4]   Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: Space-invariant tomographs [J].
Fessler, JA ;
Rogers, WL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (09) :1346-1358
[5]  
Fletcher J. G., 2015, RADIOLOGY IN PRESS
[6]   Pilot Study of Detection, Radiologist Confidence and Image Quality With Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction at Half-Routine Dose Level [J].
Fletcher, Joel G. ;
Krueger, William R. ;
Hough, David M. ;
Huprich, James E. ;
Fidler, Jeff L. ;
Wang, Jia ;
Shiung, Maria M. ;
Harmsen, W. Scott ;
Grant, Katharine L. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (02) :203-211
[7]   Task-based detectability in CT image reconstruction by filtered backprojection and penalized likelihood estimation [J].
Gang, Grace J. ;
Stayman, J. Webster ;
Zbijewski, Wojciech ;
Siewerdsen, Jeffrey H. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) :260-278
[8]   Evaluation of Nonlinear Pre-sampled Modulation Transfer Function in Iterative Reconstruction CT [J].
Jin, Hyeong Min ;
Kim, Jong Hyo .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668
[9]   Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain [J].
Leng, Shuai ;
Yu, Lifeng ;
Zhang, Yi ;
Carter, Rickey ;
Toledano, Alicia Y. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (08)
[10]   Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance [J].
Li, Ke ;
Garrett, John ;
Ge, Yongshuai ;
Chen, Guang-Hong .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (07)