Energy cropping and social licence: What's trust got to do with it?

被引:13
|
作者
Baumber, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Transdisciplinary Innovat, Ultimo 2007, Australia
关键词
Social licence to operate; Acceptance; Energy crop; Trust; Resilience; Systems thinking; RENEWABLE ENERGY; LAND-USE; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOFUELS; COMMUNITY ACCEPTANCE; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; WIND FARMS; OPERATE; BIOENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.023
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Cellulosic energy crops have been promoted in various jurisdictions for their potential to mitigate climate change and enhance energy security while avoiding some of the negative impacts associated with first-generation biofuel crops. However, the successful expansion of cellulosic energy cropping depends on its acceptance by local communities. The social licence to operate (SLO) concept has been applied in mining and other sectors since the late 1990s and offers a framework for analysing the relationships between energy cropping proponents and local communities. This review analyses recent cellulosic energy cropping studies to determine the extent to which they consider the key SLO variables of distributional fairness, procedural fairness, trust and adaptability. The results indicate that, of these four variables, trust has received the least coverage in previous studies focusing on the social dimensions of cellulosic energy cropping. This review also highlights a contrast between energy cropping studies that applied the SLO concept, all of which explicitly considered trust, and those studies that did not apply the SLO concept. This result highlights the potential role that the SLO concept could play in ensuring that the importance of trust is not overlooked by researchers, bioenergy proponents or policy-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Countering Corporate Power Through Social Control: What Does a Social Licence Offer?
    Haines, Fiona
    Bice, Sara
    Einfeld, Colette
    Sullivan, Helen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2022, 62 (01) : 184 - 199
  • [23] What's Values Got to Do With It? Thriving Among Mexican/Mexican American College Students
    Consoli, Melissa L. Morgan
    Llamas, Jasmin
    Consoli, Andres J.
    JOURNAL OF MULTICULTURAL COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 44 (01) : 49 - 64
  • [24] What's governance got to do with it? Examining the relationship between governance and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
    Benzeev, Rayna
    Wilson, Bradley
    Butler, Megan
    Massoca, Paulo
    Paudel, Karuna P.
    Redmore, Lauren P.
    Zarba, Lucia P.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [25] National level paths to the mining industry's Social Licence to Operate (SLO) in Northern Europe: The case of Finland
    Jartti, Tuija
    Litmanen, Tapio
    Lacey, Justine
    Moffat, Kieren
    EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 7 (01): : 97 - 109
  • [26] Questions of trust in health research on social capital: What aspects of personal network social capital do they measure?
    Carpiano, Richard M.
    Fitterer, Lisa M.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2014, 116 : 225 - 234
  • [27] What Do You Mean by Trust? The Free Associations of the Word "Trust"
    Tencerova, Jana
    Kassaiova, Zuzana
    Uhrecky, Branislav
    HUMAN AFFAIRS-POSTDISCIPLINARY HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES QUARTERLY, 2024, 34 (02): : 204 - 223
  • [28] Can the "Social Licence to Operate" Concept Enhance Engagement and Increase Acceptance of Renewable Energy? A Case Study of Wind Farms in Australia
    Hall, Nina Lansbury
    SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2014, 28 (3-4) : 219 - 238
  • [29] Social licence to operate: understanding how a concept has been translated into practice in energy industries
    Hall, Nina
    Lacey, Justine
    Carr-Cornish, Simone
    Dowd, Anne-Maree
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 86 : 301 - 310
  • [30] Trust, mistrust and distrust as blind spots of Social Licence to Operate: illustration via three forerunner countries in nuclear waste management
    Lehtonen, Markku
    Kajo, Matti
    Kari, Mika
    Jartti, Tuija
    Litmanen, Tapio
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (05) : 577 - 593