Energy cropping and social licence: What's trust got to do with it?

被引:13
|
作者
Baumber, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Transdisciplinary Innovat, Ultimo 2007, Australia
关键词
Social licence to operate; Acceptance; Energy crop; Trust; Resilience; Systems thinking; RENEWABLE ENERGY; LAND-USE; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOFUELS; COMMUNITY ACCEPTANCE; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; WIND FARMS; OPERATE; BIOENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.023
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Cellulosic energy crops have been promoted in various jurisdictions for their potential to mitigate climate change and enhance energy security while avoiding some of the negative impacts associated with first-generation biofuel crops. However, the successful expansion of cellulosic energy cropping depends on its acceptance by local communities. The social licence to operate (SLO) concept has been applied in mining and other sectors since the late 1990s and offers a framework for analysing the relationships between energy cropping proponents and local communities. This review analyses recent cellulosic energy cropping studies to determine the extent to which they consider the key SLO variables of distributional fairness, procedural fairness, trust and adaptability. The results indicate that, of these four variables, trust has received the least coverage in previous studies focusing on the social dimensions of cellulosic energy cropping. This review also highlights a contrast between energy cropping studies that applied the SLO concept, all of which explicitly considered trust, and those studies that did not apply the SLO concept. This result highlights the potential role that the SLO concept could play in ensuring that the importance of trust is not overlooked by researchers, bioenergy proponents or policy-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnosing death: What's trust got to do with it?
    Stell, LK
    MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 66 (04): : 229 - 235
  • [2] Trust, engagement, information and social licence-insights from New Zealand
    Edwards, Peter
    Fleming, Aysha
    Lacey, Justine
    Lester, Libby
    Pinkard, Elizabeth
    Ruckstuhl, Katharina
    Bezuidenhout, Carel
    Payn, Tim
    Bayne, Karen
    Williams, Tracy
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (02)
  • [3] How do natural resource dependent firms gain and lose a social licence?
    Dumbrell, Nikki P.
    Adamson, David
    Zuo, Alec
    Wheeler, Sarah Ann
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2021, 70
  • [4] Family Business Succession: What's Motivation Got to Do With It?
    Gagne, Marylene
    Marwick, Connor
    Brun de Pontet, Stephanie
    Wrosch, Carsten
    FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 34 (02) : 154 - 167
  • [5] Measuring social licence: What and who determines public acceptability of aquaculture in New Zealand?
    Sinner, Jim
    Newton, Mark
    Barclay, Jaye
    Baines, James
    Farrelly, Trisia
    Edwards, Peter
    Tipa, Gail
    AQUACULTURE, 2020, 521
  • [6] What's trust got to do with it? The 'washback effect' of engagement in the 2020 calculated grades process on teachers' trust and future senior cycle reform in Ireland
    Lysaght, Zita
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2023, 58 (01) : 51 - 66
  • [7] Social Licence Comes to Greenland's Mining Sector: Will Communities be Empowered?
    Bowles, Paul
    MacPhail, Fiona
    ARCTIC, 2021, 74 (04) : 496 - 508
  • [8] What Gives You a Social Licence? An Exploration of the Social Licence to Operate in the Australian Mining Industry
    Bice, Sara
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2014, 3 (01): : 62 - 80
  • [9] What's Trust Got to do With it? Lessons From Cross-Sectoral Research on Natural Resource Management in Australia and the US
    Toman, Eric Lee
    Curtis, Allan Lindsay
    Shindler, Bruce
    FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2021, 5
  • [10] What's Time Got to Do With It? Appreciation of Time Influences Social Goals and Emotional Well-Being
    Carstensen, Laura L.
    Chu, Li
    Matteson, Tyler J.
    Growney, Claire M.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2024, 39 (08) : 833 - 853